Early postoperative gait changes after total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis of the femoral head: an exploratory comparative cohort study

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a standard treatment for end-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA) and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Although both conditions can cause gait impairment, direct evidence comparing early postoperative gait changes between these etiologically distinct groups remains limited. This exploratory study compared pre-to-postoperative changes in gait quality, spatiotemporal parameters, and multiplanar joint kinematics between OA and ONFH patients after THA. Forty-eight patients undergoing unilateral robotic-assisted THA, including 22 with OA and 26 with ONFH, and 20 healthy controls underwent three-dimensional gait analysis. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at a mean follow-up of 4.19 ± 0.75 months. Gait profile score (GPS), gait variable scores (GVSs), spatiotemporal parameters, and sagittal, coronal, and transverse range of motion (ROM) were analyzed. Linear mixed-effects models adjusted for age, sex, and follow-up duration were used to evaluate Group × Time interactions, with false discovery rate correction applied separately within each outcome domain. No significant FDR-adjusted Group × Time interaction was detected for GPS or any GVS component. For GPS, the between-group difference in pre-to-postoperative change was 0.66 (95% CI − 1.37 to 2.69; P interact = 0.517, P adj = 0.939). No ROM parameter showed a significant FDR-adjusted Group × Time interaction across sagittal, coronal, or transverse planes. Among the spatiotemporal outcomes, contralateral stance proportion showed a between-group difference in change of 3.64 percentage points (95% CI 1.11 to 6.17 percentage points; P adj = 0.046). This interaction was attenuated and no longer remained significant after FDR correction in the walking-speed-adjusted sensitivity analysis (difference in change, 2.69 percentage points; P adj = 0.145). Both patient groups showed residual postoperative deviations from healthy-control reference values in several gait and kinematic parameters. In this exploratory single-center cohort, no clear diagnosis-related differential change was detected for GPS/GVS or multiplanar ROM after THA. Overall, no clear evidence of diagnosis-related differences in early gait recovery was detected, while the isolated contralateral stance finding warrants further confirmation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07346-6
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early postoperative gait changes after total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis of the femoral head: an exploratory comparative cohort study

Kaiqi Cao, 杨德金, Zhuyi Ma, Hao Tang et al.
3 links
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Early postoperative gait changes after total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis of the femoral head: an exploratory comparative cohort study

Kaiqi Cao, 杨德金, Zhuyi Ma, Hao Tang, Yixin Zhou, Siyuan Wang
article en

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a standard treatment for end-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA) and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Although both conditions can cause gait impairment, direct evidence comparing early postoperative gait changes between these etiologically distinct groups remains limited. This exploratory study compared pre-to-postoperative changes in gait quality, spatiotemporal parameters, and multiplanar joint kinematics between OA and ONFH patients after THA. Forty-eight patients undergoing unilateral robotic-assisted THA, including 22 with OA and 26 with ONFH, and 20 healthy controls underwent three-dimensional gait analysis. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at a mean follow-up of 4.19 ± 0.75 months. Gait profile score (GPS), gait variable scores (GVSs), spatiotemporal parameters, and sagittal, coronal, and transverse range of motion (ROM) were analyzed. Linear mixed-effects models adjusted for age, sex, and follow-up duration were used to evaluate Group × Time interactions, with false discovery rate correction applied separately within each outcome domain. No significant FDR-adjusted Group × Time interaction was detected for GPS or any GVS component. For GPS, the between-group difference in pre-to-postoperative change was 0.66 (95% CI − 1.37 to 2.69; P interact = 0.517, P adj = 0.939). No ROM parameter showed a significant FDR-adjusted Group × Time interaction across sagittal, coronal, or transverse planes. Among the spatiotemporal outcomes, contralateral stance proportion showed a between-group difference in change of 3.64 percentage points (95% CI 1.11 to 6.17 percentage points; P adj = 0.046). This interaction was attenuated and no longer remained significant after FDR correction in the walking-speed-adjusted sensitivity analysis (difference in change, 2.69 percentage points; P adj = 0.145). Both patient groups showed residual postoperative deviations from healthy-control reference values in several gait and kinematic parameters. In this exploratory single-center cohort, no clear diagnosis-related differential change was detected for GPS/GVS or multiplanar ROM after THA. Overall, no clear evidence of diagnosis-related differences in early gait recovery was detected, while the isolated contralateral stance finding warrants further confirmation.

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Capital Medical University (CN), Peking University (CN), Beijing Jishuitan Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon