The Effects of School Phone Bans: National Evidence from Lockable Pouches

Abstract Schools across the U.S. have sharply restricted student use of phones during the school day. We evaluate one type of restriction—lockable phone pouches—using nationwide data combining a large-scale teacher survey, GPS pings, standardized test scores, and school administrative records, along with sales records from the largest pouch provider. Using a staggered difference-in-differences design, we find that pouch adoption substantially reduces phone use as measured by GPS pings and teacher reports. In the first year after adoption, disciplinary incidents increase, and we find suggestive evidence that student subjective well-being falls, consistent with short-term disruption. However, disciplinary effects fade, while the estimated effects on well-being appear to recover and become positive in later years. For academic achievement, average effects on test scores are consistently close to zero. High schools see modest positive effects, particularly in math, while middle schools see small negative effects. We find little evidence of effects on school attendance and no clear evidence of improvements in self-reported classroom attention or perceived online bullying.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjag050
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of School Phone Bans: National Evidence from Lockable Pouches

Brian Aaron Jacob, Matthew Aaron Gentzkow, Angela Lee Duckworth, Thomas Sean Dee et al.
2 links
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
article

The Effects of School Phone Bans: National Evidence from Lockable Pouches

Brian Aaron Jacob, Matthew Aaron Gentzkow, Angela Lee Duckworth, Thomas Sean Dee, Hunt Allcott, Jason Baron
article en

Abstract

Abstract Schools across the U.S. have sharply restricted student use of phones during the school day. We evaluate one type of restriction—lockable phone pouches—using nationwide data combining a large-scale teacher survey, GPS pings, standardized test scores, and school administrative records, along with sales records from the largest pouch provider. Using a staggered difference-in-differences design, we find that pouch adoption substantially reduces phone use as measured by GPS pings and teacher reports. In the first year after adoption, disciplinary incidents increase, and we find suggestive evidence that student subjective well-being falls, consistent with short-term disruption. However, disciplinary effects fade, while the estimated effects on well-being appear to recover and become positive in later years. For academic achievement, average effects on test scores are consistently close to zero. High schools see modest positive effects, particularly in math, while middle schools see small negative effects. We find little evidence of effects on school attendance and no clear evidence of improvements in self-reported classroom attention or perceived online bullying.

The Quarterly Journal of Economics
National Bureau of Economic Research (US), Duke University (US), University of Michigan (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Stanford University (US)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The Effects of School Phone Bans: National Evidence from Lockable Pouches — Brian Aaron Jacob, Matthew Aaron Gentzkow, et al. · The Quarterly Journal of Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS