Assessing students’ judgments of appropriateness and self-reported practice of school-wide behavioral expectations: initial validation of a student-report measure

Background Within Tier 1 School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS), school-wide behavioral expectations are explicitly taught and monitored. Students’ judgments of the appropriateness of expected behaviors and their self-reported typical practice provide complementary perspectives, yet existing assessment tools do not directly pair these perspectives for the same expectations. We therefore developed the Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports–Rules, Instruction, Safety, and Emotions (PBIS-RISE) questionnaire, comprising two parallel scales: Positive Behavioral Appropriateness (PBA) and Positive Behavioral Practice (PBP). Methods Participants were 400 fourth- to eighth-grade students (aged 9–17 years) from 23 classes of two schools in Palermo (Italy) not implementing PBIS; classroom teachers rated each student's behavior. Each scale was reduced from 54 to 36 items (72 student-rated items overall) through item reduction in the same sample. Results Confirmatory factor analyses supported a structure with nine behavioral expectations, three school-wide values, and a general factor, with acceptable fit for PBA (CFI = 0.956, TLI = 0.952, RMSEA = 0.046, SRMR = 0.052) and PBP (CFI = 0.954, TLI = 0.950, RMSEA = 0.054, SRMR = 0.048); the three values were very highly correlated ( r = 0.94–0.98), indicating a strong general factor. Subscale reliability ranged from ω = 0.66 to 0.87. Measurement invariance across gender was supported. Cross-form invariance between PBA and PBP was supported when tested with an ordinal procedure, although the joint model showed estimation problems. PBP scores correlated modestly with teacher ratings [ r = 0.23, 95% CI (0.13, 0.32)], to a similar extent as PBA scores. Conclusion The findings provide initial psychometric evidence supporting the PBIS-RISE as a measure of students’ reported appraisal and practice of school-wide behavioral expectations. Because the item structure was derived and evaluated in the same sample from two schools not implementing PBIS, replication in independent samples and in PBIS schools, as well as evidence of sensitivity to intervention, are required before the instrument is used to evaluate Tier 1 instruction or to inform educational decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1993233
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing students’ judgments of appropriateness and self-reported practice of school-wide behavioral expectations: initial validation of a student-report measure

Antonella Chifari, Alessandro Geraci, Marco Arrigo, Antonella D’Amico et al.
Frontiers in Education
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Assessing students’ judgments of appropriateness and self-reported practice of school-wide behavioral expectations: initial validation of a student-report measure

Antonella Chifari, Alessandro Geraci, Marco Arrigo, Antonella D’Amico, Giuseppe Chiazzese, Ivan Giuseppe Cammarata
article en

Abstract

Background Within Tier 1 School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS), school-wide behavioral expectations are explicitly taught and monitored. Students’ judgments of the appropriateness of expected behaviors and their self-reported typical practice provide complementary perspectives, yet existing assessment tools do not directly pair these perspectives for the same expectations. We therefore developed the Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports–Rules, Instruction, Safety, and Emotions (PBIS-RISE) questionnaire, comprising two parallel scales: Positive Behavioral Appropriateness (PBA) and Positive Behavioral Practice (PBP). Methods Participants were 400 fourth- to eighth-grade students (aged 9–17 years) from 23 classes of two schools in Palermo (Italy) not implementing PBIS; classroom teachers rated each student's behavior. Each scale was reduced from 54 to 36 items (72 student-rated items overall) through item reduction in the same sample. Results Confirmatory factor analyses supported a structure with nine behavioral expectations, three school-wide values, and a general factor, with acceptable fit for PBA (CFI = 0.956, TLI = 0.952, RMSEA = 0.046, SRMR = 0.052) and PBP (CFI = 0.954, TLI = 0.950, RMSEA = 0.054, SRMR = 0.048); the three values were very highly correlated ( r = 0.94–0.98), indicating a strong general factor. Subscale reliability ranged from ω = 0.66 to 0.87. Measurement invariance across gender was supported. Cross-form invariance between PBA and PBP was supported when tested with an ordinal procedure, although the joint model showed estimation problems. PBP scores correlated modestly with teacher ratings [ r = 0.23, 95% CI (0.13, 0.32)], to a similar extent as PBA scores. Conclusion The findings provide initial psychometric evidence supporting the PBIS-RISE as a measure of students’ reported appraisal and practice of school-wide behavioral expectations. Because the item structure was derived and evaluated in the same sample from two schools not implementing PBIS, replication in independent samples and in PBIS schools, as well as evidence of sensitivity to intervention, are required before the instrument is used to evaluate Tier 1 instruction or to inform educational decisions.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
National Research Council (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon