Artificial intelligence and SDGs, a friend or foe: A perspective of Kantianism

Humans have keen interests with artificial objects. We consume food and drinks containing artificial coloring while FIFA approves the use of artificial turf for football matches. However, the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has gripped the world with its radical changes, triggering not only physical, but also philosophical implications. In this paper, we explore the impact of AI on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and pose the question of whether the human centrality of the SDGs could diminish with the introduction of AI. Drawing on Kant’s concept of universalism and categorical imperatives, we argue that AI cannot safeguard intergenerational justice or meet Kant’s definition of a rational being. This paper presents a brief yet significant perspective, emphasizing the need for caution when integrating AI into the implementation of the SDGs, particularly concerning policy design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Sustainable Development Research
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/19643
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence and SDGs, a friend or foe: A perspective of Kantianism

Tan Seng Teck, Mohd Rushidi Mohd Amin, Chee How Liau, Pradeep Sonar et al.
European Journal of Sustainable Development Research
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial intelligence and SDGs, a friend or foe: A perspective of Kantianism

Tan Seng Teck, Mohd Rushidi Mohd Amin, Chee How Liau, Pradeep Sonar, Elizabeth Lee
article en

Abstract

Humans have keen interests with artificial objects. We consume food and drinks containing artificial coloring while FIFA approves the use of artificial turf for football matches. However, the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has gripped the world with its radical changes, triggering not only physical, but also philosophical implications. In this paper, we explore the impact of AI on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and pose the question of whether the human centrality of the SDGs could diminish with the introduction of AI. Drawing on Kant’s concept of universalism and categorical imperatives, we argue that AI cannot safeguard intergenerational justice or meet Kant’s definition of a rational being. This paper presents a brief yet significant perspective, emphasizing the need for caution when integrating AI into the implementation of the SDGs, particularly concerning policy design.

European Journal of Sustainable Development ResearchVol. 11(1)
INTI International University (MY), Parul University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon