Validity and Reliability of the Artificial Intelligence Awareness Scale for Adolescents Aged 13–18: Implications for Public Policy and Governance

Abstract This research aimed to develop and validate a scale to measure AI awareness among adolescents aged 13–18. A descriptive survey model was employed, with data collected online from 122 voluntary participants (mean age 14.78). Following a literature review and expert evaluation, an initial 26-item pool was developed. Item analysis resulted in the removal of three items, and exploratory factor analysis supported a two-factor structure comprising 23 items and explaining 37.4% of the total variance. The first factor, “Perceived Benefits of AI,” consisted of 16 items (Cronbach’s α = .888), while the second factor, “AI Threat Perception,” consisted of 7 items (Cronbach’s α = .793). Confirmatory factor analysis of the two-factor structure yielded acceptable fit indices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11157084/v1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Validity and Reliability of the Artificial Intelligence Awareness Scale for Adolescents Aged 13–18: Implications for Public Policy and Governance

Özlem Yılmaz Demirel, Abdullah Demirel, Veysel Temel
6 links
Research Square
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Validity and Reliability of the Artificial Intelligence Awareness Scale for Adolescents Aged 13–18: Implications for Public Policy and Governance

Özlem Yılmaz Demirel, Abdullah Demirel, Veysel Temel
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract This research aimed to develop and validate a scale to measure AI awareness among adolescents aged 13–18. A descriptive survey model was employed, with data collected online from 122 voluntary participants (mean age 14.78). Following a literature review and expert evaluation, an initial 26-item pool was developed. Item analysis resulted in the removal of three items, and exploratory factor analysis supported a two-factor structure comprising 23 items and explaining 37.4% of the total variance. The first factor, “Perceived Benefits of AI,” consisted of 16 items (Cronbach’s α = .888), while the second factor, “AI Threat Perception,” consisted of 7 items (Cronbach’s α = .793). Confirmatory factor analysis of the two-factor structure yielded acceptable fit indices.

Research Square
Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon