Trade Interdependence in the Modern Global Economy

Analyzing global trade interdependence requires an approach that incorporates fundamental features of the modern economy: intense trade in intermediates and the changing availability of alternative partners and substitute products. We use theoretical models of structural gravity to construct measures of dyadic dependence that directly incorporate these features. The measures describe (1) how much trade interruptions damage a country’s welfare and (2) how much additional trade it would take from their existing trade partners to compensate. We then show three important findings. First, the new measures differ from traditional measures based on aggregate trade statistics. Second, they show how, contrary to much common wisdom, the world has not marched inexorably toward greater interdependence. Third, we use China’s foreign assistance, as exemplified by the Belt and Road Initiative, to assess the consequences of one major government policy. Chinese assistance has increased partners’ dependence on China, without a reciprocal increase in Chinese dependence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Political Science Review
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055426101981
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade Interdependence in the Modern Global Economy

Stephen Chaudoin, Michael‐David Mangini
American Political Science Review
Global trade and economics
article

Trade Interdependence in the Modern Global Economy

Stephen Chaudoin, Michael‐David Mangini
article en

Abstract

Analyzing global trade interdependence requires an approach that incorporates fundamental features of the modern economy: intense trade in intermediates and the changing availability of alternative partners and substitute products. We use theoretical models of structural gravity to construct measures of dyadic dependence that directly incorporate these features. The measures describe (1) how much trade interruptions damage a country’s welfare and (2) how much additional trade it would take from their existing trade partners to compensate. We then show three important findings. First, the new measures differ from traditional measures based on aggregate trade statistics. Second, they show how, contrary to much common wisdom, the world has not marched inexorably toward greater interdependence. Third, we use China’s foreign assistance, as exemplified by the Belt and Road Initiative, to assess the consequences of one major government policy. Chinese assistance has increased partners’ dependence on China, without a reciprocal increase in Chinese dependence.

American Political Science Review
University of Southern California (US), Harvard University (US)
Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon