Women's Empowerment Measurement in Quantitative Reproductive Health Studies: From Unidimensional Proxies to a Multidimensional Framework

Women's empowerment is among the most studied determinants of reproductive health in low-and middle-income countries, yet quantitative reproductive health research continues to operationalise it through single proxies even though the construct is theoretically established as multidimensional.This reliance on unidimensional measurement misrepresents the construct and produces findings that are often inconsistent across settings.This review develops and defends a transparent, multidimensional framework for measuring women's empowerment from Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data, grounded in Kabeer's resources, agency, and achievements model, and illustrates it using Cameroon DHS data.A structured narrative review informed the synthesis of six dimensions recurrent in reproductive health studies: economic, educational, sociocultural, reproductive, normative, and digital, each operationalised from standard DHS variables through a standardised additive scoring protocol.Measurement quality was assessed by distinguishing reflective from formative indices and by multicollinearity diagnostics.The framework was constructed on the 2018 Cameroon DHS (n = 4,449 partnered women aged 15-49 with a recent birth or pregnancy).The two reflective dimensions (educational, digital) met the α ≥ 0.70 threshold, the four formative dimensions were validated by construct coverage, and correlation and variance-inflation diagnostics confirmed that all six dimensions are statistically independent.Sub-dimension analysis revealed heterogeneity that a single index conceals, including a substantial digital access-and-use gap.A domain-differentiated additive framework is theoretically necessary, operationally achievable, and internally consistent within existing DHS infrastructure, preserving the dimension-specific effects essential for intervention design.

Publication Details

Journal
Texila international journal of academic research
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21522/tijar.2014.13.04.art026
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Women's Empowerment Measurement in Quantitative Reproductive Health Studies: From Unidimensional Proxies to a Multidimensional Framework

1 links
Texila international journal of academic research
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Women's Empowerment Measurement in Quantitative Reproductive Health Studies: From Unidimensional Proxies to a Multidimensional Framework

article en

Abstract

Women's empowerment is among the most studied determinants of reproductive health in low-and middle-income countries, yet quantitative reproductive health research continues to operationalise it through single proxies even though the construct is theoretically established as multidimensional.This reliance on unidimensional measurement misrepresents the construct and produces findings that are often inconsistent across settings.This review develops and defends a transparent, multidimensional framework for measuring women's empowerment from Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data, grounded in Kabeer's resources, agency, and achievements model, and illustrates it using Cameroon DHS data.A structured narrative review informed the synthesis of six dimensions recurrent in reproductive health studies: economic, educational, sociocultural, reproductive, normative, and digital, each operationalised from standard DHS variables through a standardised additive scoring protocol.Measurement quality was assessed by distinguishing reflective from formative indices and by multicollinearity diagnostics.The framework was constructed on the 2018 Cameroon DHS (n = 4,449 partnered women aged 15-49 with a recent birth or pregnancy).The two reflective dimensions (educational, digital) met the α ≥ 0.70 threshold, the four formative dimensions were validated by construct coverage, and correlation and variance-inflation diagnostics confirmed that all six dimensions are statistically independent.Sub-dimension analysis revealed heterogeneity that a single index conceals, including a substantial digital access-and-use gap.A domain-differentiated additive framework is theoretically necessary, operationally achievable, and internally consistent within existing DHS infrastructure, preserving the dimension-specific effects essential for intervention design.

Texila international journal of academic researchVol. 13(04)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon