Writing After Srebrenica: The Grammar of Grief and the Ethics of Testimonial Representation

This paper examines testimonial literature emerging from the Srebrenica genocide as a crucial site of ethical witnessing, moral resistance and memory-making. Drawing on survivor-authored memoirs and essays, it explores how trauma is transformed into language through a grammar of grief: a fragmented, hesitant mode of expression that articulates loss and survival without resolving suffering into narrative closure. Situating these texts within debates on testimony, memory and post-atrocity ethics, the paper shows how narration functions not only as personal survival but also as intervention in contested fields of historical truth and collective remembrance. Testimonial literature after Srebrenica operates in a liminal space between silence and speech, fact and affect, individual experience and collective responsibility. Here, memory becomes an ongoing ethical practice rather than a finished account of the past. By foregrounding survivor voices, the paper highlights their agency in shaping how Srebrenica is remembered across generations and argues that writing after Srebrenica constitutes moral resistance against denial and erasure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life Writing
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14484528.2026.2748682
Primary Topic
Memory, Trauma, and Testimony
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Writing After Srebrenica: The Grammar of Grief and the Ethics of Testimonial Representation

Hariz Halilovich
Life Writing
Memory, Trauma, and Testimony
article

Writing After Srebrenica: The Grammar of Grief and the Ethics of Testimonial Representation

Hariz Halilovich
article en

Abstract

This paper examines testimonial literature emerging from the Srebrenica genocide as a crucial site of ethical witnessing, moral resistance and memory-making. Drawing on survivor-authored memoirs and essays, it explores how trauma is transformed into language through a grammar of grief: a fragmented, hesitant mode of expression that articulates loss and survival without resolving suffering into narrative closure. Situating these texts within debates on testimony, memory and post-atrocity ethics, the paper shows how narration functions not only as personal survival but also as intervention in contested fields of historical truth and collective remembrance. Testimonial literature after Srebrenica operates in a liminal space between silence and speech, fact and affect, individual experience and collective responsibility. Here, memory becomes an ongoing ethical practice rather than a finished account of the past. By foregrounding survivor voices, the paper highlights their agency in shaping how Srebrenica is remembered across generations and argues that writing after Srebrenica constitutes moral resistance against denial and erasure.

Life Writing
RMIT University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Memory, Trauma, and Testimony
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon