AI-Driven Intelligent Judicial Case Management System: A Review

Courts in many jurisdictions, and in India in particular, face a persistent backlog that manual scheduling and file handling cannot clear. This paper reviews five recent studies that together cover the main building blocks of an AI-driven intelligent judicial case management system: rule-based case prioritisation, machine-learning prediction of case delay and duration, large-language-model (LLM) based judgment prediction, AI-assisted trial workflows for criminal cases, and public perception of automation at different stages of adjudication. The studies are compared on objective, data, method, reported results and stated limitations. On this basis a six-layer conceptual architecture is outlined, with explainability and human oversight as core layers. The review suggests that (i) prioritisation and delay prediction offer the most immediate and least contentious gains, (ii) outcome-prediction accuracies are promising but are not directly comparable across studies and are not sufficient for deployment, and (iii) public acceptance depends on keeping the judge in control of the later stages of decision-making. Open challenges include data quality, bias, explainability, legal regulation and evaluation in real courts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23802832
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Driven Intelligent Judicial Case Management System: A Review

Bangar A. P, Dr. A. A. Khatri, S. B. Bhosale, Parth Vishwas Kale
3 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

AI-Driven Intelligent Judicial Case Management System: A Review

Bangar A. P, Dr. A. A. Khatri, S. B. Bhosale, Parth Vishwas Kale
article en

Abstract

Courts in many jurisdictions, and in India in particular, face a persistent backlog that manual scheduling and file handling cannot clear. This paper reviews five recent studies that together cover the main building blocks of an AI-driven intelligent judicial case management system: rule-based case prioritisation, machine-learning prediction of case delay and duration, large-language-model (LLM) based judgment prediction, AI-assisted trial workflows for criminal cases, and public perception of automation at different stages of adjudication. The studies are compared on objective, data, method, reported results and stated limitations. On this basis a six-layer conceptual architecture is outlined, with explainability and human oversight as core layers. The review suggests that (i) prioritisation and delay prediction offer the most immediate and least contentious gains, (ii) outcome-prediction accuracies are promising but are not directly comparable across studies and are not sufficient for deployment, and (iii) public acceptance depends on keeping the judge in control of the later stages of decision-making. Open challenges include data quality, bias, explainability, legal regulation and evaluation in real courts.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon