Implementation Under Spontaneity: Bureaucratic Coping and Moral Persuasion in India’s Demonetisation

ABSTRACT Governments sometimes announce policies without adequate administrative planning, forcing implementers to improvise under uncertainty. This paper examines how bureaucrats navigate such spontaneous policies through the case study of India’s 2016 demonetisation. Drawing on street‐level and institutional perspectives on policy implementation, the study finds that reluctant implementers managed operational breakdowns through emergency procedures, informal coordination, and iterative problem‐solving. Simultaneously, policymakers framed hardship as moral sacrifice for a formalised economy, offering implementers a justification for effort they were in any case obliged to expend—though the resonance was uneven, with sentiments ranging from trust to scepticism. The paper conceptualises grudging implementation as an adaptive behavioural mode sustained by both extrinsic procedures and intrinsic moral appeal, extending implementation theory to the context of politically spontaneous reforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration and Development
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.70136
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation Under Spontaneity: Bureaucratic Coping and Moral Persuasion in India’s Demonetisation

Mousumi Padhi, Pradeep Kumar Mishra
Public Administration and Development
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Implementation Under Spontaneity: Bureaucratic Coping and Moral Persuasion in India’s Demonetisation

Mousumi Padhi, Pradeep Kumar Mishra
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Governments sometimes announce policies without adequate administrative planning, forcing implementers to improvise under uncertainty. This paper examines how bureaucrats navigate such spontaneous policies through the case study of India’s 2016 demonetisation. Drawing on street‐level and institutional perspectives on policy implementation, the study finds that reluctant implementers managed operational breakdowns through emergency procedures, informal coordination, and iterative problem‐solving. Simultaneously, policymakers framed hardship as moral sacrifice for a formalised economy, offering implementers a justification for effort they were in any case obliged to expend—though the resonance was uneven, with sentiments ranging from trust to scepticism. The paper conceptualises grudging implementation as an adaptive behavioural mode sustained by both extrinsic procedures and intrinsic moral appeal, extending implementation theory to the context of politically spontaneous reforms.

Public Administration and Development
XIM University (IN), Division of Human Resource Management (US)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon