Manual-supported critical-thinking activities improve preschool reasoning performance: a multisite cluster-randomized study in Kazakhstan

Introduction Structured opportunities to compare, predict, justify, and revise responses may support preschool reasoning, but evidence from multisite cluster-randomized evaluations using active pedagogical comparison conditions remains limited. Methods This study evaluated a 16-week manual-supported critical-thinking programme involving 604 children aged 60–71 months from 36 classrooms in 10 preschool institutions in Kazakhstan. Eighteen classrooms received 32 educator-led sessions targeting comparison, classification, prediction, evidence-based explanation, alternative generation, and answer revision; 18 classrooms received an active pedagogical comparison programme with the same scheduled duration and frequency. Reasoning performance was assessed at baseline, immediate post-test, and three-month follow-up using three counterbalanced forms of 12 unfamiliar tasks scored from 0 to 24. Linear mixed-effects models accounted for classroom clustering, repeated child-level observations, institution, age, sex, and instructional language. Results Immediate post-test data were available for 559 children and follow-up data for 545. The intervention produced greater baseline-to-post-test improvement than the active comparison condition, with an adjusted difference of 1.15 points (95% CI 0.77–1.53, p < .001) and a standardized effect of 0.38. At three-month follow-up, the adjusted difference was 0.61 points (95% CI 0.20–1.02, p = .004), corresponding to a standardized effect of 0.20. Multiple-imputation analyses yielded comparable estimates. Discussion The programme produced a modest-to-moderate immediate advantage in directly assessed preschool reasoning performance, with a smaller but detectable advantage three months after programme completion. The findings indicate partial short-term maintenance and should be interpreted within the study-specific criterion-referenced outcome and the targeted reasoning domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1951133
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Manual-supported critical-thinking activities improve preschool reasoning performance: a multisite cluster-randomized study in Kazakhstan

Ulbossyn Kyyakbayeva, Bakhytzhamal Аrzanbayeva, Akgul Zhubandykova, Aigerim Sekenova et al.
1 links
Frontiers in Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Manual-supported critical-thinking activities improve preschool reasoning performance: a multisite cluster-randomized study in Kazakhstan

Ulbossyn Kyyakbayeva, Bakhytzhamal Аrzanbayeva, Akgul Zhubandykova, Aigerim Sekenova, Anar Kapenova, Aktoty Tuzdybayeva
article en

Abstract

Introduction Structured opportunities to compare, predict, justify, and revise responses may support preschool reasoning, but evidence from multisite cluster-randomized evaluations using active pedagogical comparison conditions remains limited. Methods This study evaluated a 16-week manual-supported critical-thinking programme involving 604 children aged 60–71 months from 36 classrooms in 10 preschool institutions in Kazakhstan. Eighteen classrooms received 32 educator-led sessions targeting comparison, classification, prediction, evidence-based explanation, alternative generation, and answer revision; 18 classrooms received an active pedagogical comparison programme with the same scheduled duration and frequency. Reasoning performance was assessed at baseline, immediate post-test, and three-month follow-up using three counterbalanced forms of 12 unfamiliar tasks scored from 0 to 24. Linear mixed-effects models accounted for classroom clustering, repeated child-level observations, institution, age, sex, and instructional language. Results Immediate post-test data were available for 559 children and follow-up data for 545. The intervention produced greater baseline-to-post-test improvement than the active comparison condition, with an adjusted difference of 1.15 points (95% CI 0.77–1.53, p < .001) and a standardized effect of 0.38. At three-month follow-up, the adjusted difference was 0.61 points (95% CI 0.20–1.02, p = .004), corresponding to a standardized effect of 0.20. Multiple-imputation analyses yielded comparable estimates. Discussion The programme produced a modest-to-moderate immediate advantage in directly assessed preschool reasoning performance, with a smaller but detectable advantage three months after programme completion. The findings indicate partial short-term maintenance and should be interpreted within the study-specific criterion-referenced outcome and the targeted reasoning domains.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University (KZ), Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University (KZ)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon