THE REIMAGINING OF CLASSICAL TROPES: ISOLATION, IDENTITY, AND SOCIETAL JUDGMENT IN ROMANTIC LITERATURE AND HISTORICAL FICTION

This article compares the representation of isolation, identity, and societal judgment in Romantic literature and historical fiction. It uses qualitative close reading to examine Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1818), Emily Brontë's Wuthering Heights (1847), and Walter Scott's Waverley (1814), supported by scholarship on Romantic affect and the historical novel. The analysis argues that these themes are shared across the selected works but are shaped by different narrative emphases. In Frankenstein and Wuthering Heights, isolation is closely associated with emotional alienation, disrupted relationships, and the struggle for recognition. In Waverley, identity and belonging are negotiated within competing political loyalties and the historical divisions surrounding the Jacobite rising of 1745. The article also shows that societal judgment operates through appearance, class, gender expectations, and political affiliation. Rather than treating Romantic literature and historical fiction as mutually exclusive categories, the study highlights their overlap and argues that both genres expose the tension between individual self-understanding and collective norms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23801303
Primary Topic
American and British Literature Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE REIMAGINING OF CLASSICAL TROPES: ISOLATION, IDENTITY, AND SOCIETAL JUDGMENT IN ROMANTIC LITERATURE AND HISTORICAL FICTION

Dadabayeva Lazokatkhan Boxodir kizi, Muhtaramabonu Dilshod qizi Qurbonaliyeva
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
American and British Literature Analysis
article

THE REIMAGINING OF CLASSICAL TROPES: ISOLATION, IDENTITY, AND SOCIETAL JUDGMENT IN ROMANTIC LITERATURE AND HISTORICAL FICTION

Dadabayeva Lazokatkhan Boxodir kizi, Muhtaramabonu Dilshod qizi Qurbonaliyeva
article en

Abstract

This article compares the representation of isolation, identity, and societal judgment in Romantic literature and historical fiction. It uses qualitative close reading to examine Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1818), Emily Brontë's Wuthering Heights (1847), and Walter Scott's Waverley (1814), supported by scholarship on Romantic affect and the historical novel. The analysis argues that these themes are shared across the selected works but are shaped by different narrative emphases. In Frankenstein and Wuthering Heights, isolation is closely associated with emotional alienation, disrupted relationships, and the struggle for recognition. In Waverley, identity and belonging are negotiated within competing political loyalties and the historical divisions surrounding the Jacobite rising of 1745. The article also shows that societal judgment operates through appearance, class, gender expectations, and political affiliation. Rather than treating Romantic literature and historical fiction as mutually exclusive categories, the study highlights their overlap and argues that both genres expose the tension between individual self-understanding and collective norms.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
American and British Literature Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon