Does Short Molecular Dynamics Rescoring Improve the Ranking of p38α Inhibitors over Docking? A Replicate Benchmark

Rescoring docked ligands with molecular dynamics (MD) and end point free energy methods such as MM/GBSA is widely used, but its benefit over docking for series of close analogs is uncertain. We compared AutoDock Vina scores with Md based MM/GBSA energies for 29 neutral p38α kinase inhibitors (PDB 3FLY) from the Open Force Field protein-ligand benchmark, whose IC50 values from a single publication span 3.8 kcal/mol in estimate ΔG. Each ligand was docked with three random seeds and simulated in two independent 20 ns replicas started from the benchmark pose (AMBER99SB-ILDN, GAFF2, TIP3L; GROMACS). MM/GBSA energies were calculated from 251 frames per trajectory without an entropy term. All 58 simulations remained stable with the ligand bound. Vina scores correlated weakly with experimental ΔG (Spearman ρ = 0.28 98% CI -0.15 to 0.62), as did replica averaged MM/GBSA energies (ρ = 0.24 -0.18 to 0.62). The difference was -0.03 (-0.50 to 0.43), so the methods were not distinguishable. Independent replicas of the same ligand differed by 3.3 kcal/mol on average, comparable to the experimental range. Raising the interior dielectric constant from 1 to 2 gave a nearly identical ranking (ρ = 0.96 between the two sets of scores; ρ = 0.37 against experiment, -0.04 to 0.69). In an exploratory analysis, ligands size alone correlated with affinity (ρ = 0.60, 0.28 to 0.82), whereas neither computed score tracked size. For this narrow range series, short MD rescoring gave no measurable improvement over docking, and replica variability limited its resolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.27.762277
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Does Short Molecular Dynamics Rescoring Improve the Ranking of p38α Inhibitors over Docking? A Replicate Benchmark

Akshaya Dhakal, Gungun Chand
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
preprint

Does Short Molecular Dynamics Rescoring Improve the Ranking of p38α Inhibitors over Docking? A Replicate Benchmark

Akshaya Dhakal, Gungun Chand
preprint en

Abstract

Rescoring docked ligands with molecular dynamics (MD) and end point free energy methods such as MM/GBSA is widely used, but its benefit over docking for series of close analogs is uncertain. We compared AutoDock Vina scores with Md based MM/GBSA energies for 29 neutral p38α kinase inhibitors (PDB 3FLY) from the Open Force Field protein-ligand benchmark, whose IC50 values from a single publication span 3.8 kcal/mol in estimate ΔG. Each ligand was docked with three random seeds and simulated in two independent 20 ns replicas started from the benchmark pose (AMBER99SB-ILDN, GAFF2, TIP3L; GROMACS). MM/GBSA energies were calculated from 251 frames per trajectory without an entropy term. All 58 simulations remained stable with the ligand bound. Vina scores correlated weakly with experimental ΔG (Spearman ρ = 0.28 98% CI -0.15 to 0.62), as did replica averaged MM/GBSA energies (ρ = 0.24 -0.18 to 0.62). The difference was -0.03 (-0.50 to 0.43), so the methods were not distinguishable. Independent replicas of the same ligand differed by 3.3 kcal/mol on average, comparable to the experimental range. Raising the interior dielectric constant from 1 to 2 gave a nearly identical ranking (ρ = 0.96 between the two sets of scores; ρ = 0.37 against experiment, -0.04 to 0.69). In an exploratory analysis, ligands size alone correlated with affinity (ρ = 0.60, 0.28 to 0.82), whereas neither computed score tracked size. For this narrow range series, short MD rescoring gave no measurable improvement over docking, and replica variability limited its resolution.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
St. Xavier's College (Autonomous) (IN), St. Xavier's College (IN)
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon