Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Sensory Recovery Following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction with Superficial Neurotization

BACKGROUND: Superficial breast neurotization, involving elongation of the fourth intercostal lateral cutaneous nerve to the preserved nipple and skin, shows promise in sensory recovery. However, the impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), on sensory outcomes in breast neurotization is underexplored. This study evaluates PMRT's impact on sensory outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction with neurotization from August 2019 to August 2024. Patients were categorized into PMRT and non-PMRT groups, with sensory assessments performed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using a questionnaire incorporating BREAST-Q domains and study-specific items addressing aesthetic and sensory outcomes. RESULTS: Among 135 patients, 27 received PMRT. Both groups exhibited reduced sensation compared to the normal breast (PMRT: 31.51 ± 81.70 vs. 0.07 ± 0.19 g, p < 0.001; non-PMRT: 14.62 ± 54.27 vs. 0.07 ± 0.17 g, p < 0.001). Preoperative thresholds were similar between groups (PMRT vs. non-PMRT: 0.10 ± 0.23 vs. 28.49 ± 85.76 g, p = 0.950). Sensory recovery improved gradually in both groups, with differences diminishing over time (PMRT vs. non-PMRT at 0-6 months: 158.27 ± 140.97 vs. 58.11 ± 98.37 g, p = 0.007; 19-24 months: 1.40 ± 2.20 vs. 2.76 ± 13.90 g, p = 0.389). Nipple sensation and sensory-related BREAST-Q domains showed no significant. PMRT group reported modestly lower psychosocial well-being (36.95 ± 9.98 vs. 41.68 ± 7.35, p = 0.042) and satisfaction with breasts (42.64 ± 9.34 vs. 48.65 ± 8.15, p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: While PMRT initially impedes sensory recovery after neurotization, this negative impact diminishes progressively. By 13-18 months postoperatively, patients who received PMRT achieve sensory outcomes comparable to non-irradiated cases. Furthermore, PMRT does not significantly increase complication rates or the need for secondary revision procedures in this patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2993-6822
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Sensory Recovery Following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction with Superficial Neurotization

Johnny Chuieng‐Yi Lu, David Cheong, Tommy Nai‐Jen Chang, Ying‐Hsuan Lee et al.
4 links
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Sensory Recovery Following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction with Superficial Neurotization

Johnny Chuieng‐Yi Lu, David Cheong, Tommy Nai‐Jen Chang, Ying‐Hsuan Lee, Hsu‐Huan Chou, Jung‐Ju Huang, Wen‐Ling Kuo, Chia-Fang Chen, I-Ting Huang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Superficial breast neurotization, involving elongation of the fourth intercostal lateral cutaneous nerve to the preserved nipple and skin, shows promise in sensory recovery. However, the impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), on sensory outcomes in breast neurotization is underexplored. This study evaluates PMRT's impact on sensory outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction with neurotization from August 2019 to August 2024. Patients were categorized into PMRT and non-PMRT groups, with sensory assessments performed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using a questionnaire incorporating BREAST-Q domains and study-specific items addressing aesthetic and sensory outcomes. RESULTS: Among 135 patients, 27 received PMRT. Both groups exhibited reduced sensation compared to the normal breast (PMRT: 31.51 ± 81.70 vs. 0.07 ± 0.19 g, p < 0.001; non-PMRT: 14.62 ± 54.27 vs. 0.07 ± 0.17 g, p < 0.001). Preoperative thresholds were similar between groups (PMRT vs. non-PMRT: 0.10 ± 0.23 vs. 28.49 ± 85.76 g, p = 0.950). Sensory recovery improved gradually in both groups, with differences diminishing over time (PMRT vs. non-PMRT at 0-6 months: 158.27 ± 140.97 vs. 58.11 ± 98.37 g, p = 0.007; 19-24 months: 1.40 ± 2.20 vs. 2.76 ± 13.90 g, p = 0.389). Nipple sensation and sensory-related BREAST-Q domains showed no significant. PMRT group reported modestly lower psychosocial well-being (36.95 ± 9.98 vs. 41.68 ± 7.35, p = 0.042) and satisfaction with breasts (42.64 ± 9.34 vs. 48.65 ± 8.15, p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: While PMRT initially impedes sensory recovery after neurotization, this negative impact diminishes progressively. By 13-18 months postoperatively, patients who received PMRT achieve sensory outcomes comparable to non-irradiated cases. Furthermore, PMRT does not significantly increase complication rates or the need for secondary revision procedures in this patient population.

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Chang Gung University (TW), National Tsing Hua University (TW), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon