Heterogeneity in Relation of Body Composition from BIA and DXA to handgrip strength and isokinetic knee strength

Objective This study aimed to simultaneously evaluate the relationship between body composition assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with muscle strength in the same cohort of community-dwelling adults, and to compare the associations of these two modalities for handgrip and lower limb muscle strength. Methods A total of 94 community-dwelling adults (59 women, 35 men) aged ≥40 years underwent body composition assessment using DXA and BIA, along with isokinetic knee strength and handgrip strength measurements. Correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine associations between body composition parameters and muscle strength, stratified by sex where appropriate. Results In the fully adjusted models (age, BMI, and sex), BIA-derived parameters remained significantly associated with handgrip strength (e.g., UEFFM: β = 0.646, p < 0.001; FFM: β = 0.428, p < 0.05), whereas most DXA-derived parameters were no longer significant. For knee extensor strength, DXA-derived appendicular and leg-specific lean mass indices remained significant (ALM: β = 0.579, p < 0.01; LELM: β = 0.510, p < 0.01), while among BIA parameters only FFM remained significant (β = 0.542, p < 0.05). For knee flexor strength, both DXA- and BIA-derived parameters showed significant associations (e.g., DXA ALM: β = 0.551, p < 0.01; BIA FFM: β = 0.650, p < 0.01). Segment-specific analyses revealed that lower limb strength correlated more strongly with leg-specific lean mass, while handgrip strength showed closer associations with arm-specific measures. Conclusion After adjustment for age, BMI, and sex, BIA and DXA showed modality-specific associations with muscle strength. BIA was more strongly associated with handgrip strength, whereas DXA-derived height-adjusted indices were more strongly associated with lower limb strength. These findings support the tailored use of BIA and DXA in functional assessment, although neither method directly measures skeletal muscle mass.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metabolism Open
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metop.2026.100516
Primary Topic
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterogeneity in Relation of Body Composition from BIA and DXA to handgrip strength and isokinetic knee strength

刘发岩, Qingyu Zhang, Ling Wang, Chaoying Liu et al.
Metabolism Open
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
article

Heterogeneity in Relation of Body Composition from BIA and DXA to handgrip strength and isokinetic knee strength

刘发岩, Qingyu Zhang, Ling Wang, Chaoying Liu, Jing Zheng, Yi Yuan, Zitong Cheng, Kexin Wang, Xiaoguang Cheng, Jiabao Mo, Bo Hu, Jian Geng
article en

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to simultaneously evaluate the relationship between body composition assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with muscle strength in the same cohort of community-dwelling adults, and to compare the associations of these two modalities for handgrip and lower limb muscle strength. Methods A total of 94 community-dwelling adults (59 women, 35 men) aged ≥40 years underwent body composition assessment using DXA and BIA, along with isokinetic knee strength and handgrip strength measurements. Correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine associations between body composition parameters and muscle strength, stratified by sex where appropriate. Results In the fully adjusted models (age, BMI, and sex), BIA-derived parameters remained significantly associated with handgrip strength (e.g., UEFFM: β = 0.646, p < 0.001; FFM: β = 0.428, p < 0.05), whereas most DXA-derived parameters were no longer significant. For knee extensor strength, DXA-derived appendicular and leg-specific lean mass indices remained significant (ALM: β = 0.579, p < 0.01; LELM: β = 0.510, p < 0.01), while among BIA parameters only FFM remained significant (β = 0.542, p < 0.05). For knee flexor strength, both DXA- and BIA-derived parameters showed significant associations (e.g., DXA ALM: β = 0.551, p < 0.01; BIA FFM: β = 0.650, p < 0.01). Segment-specific analyses revealed that lower limb strength correlated more strongly with leg-specific lean mass, while handgrip strength showed closer associations with arm-specific measures. Conclusion After adjustment for age, BMI, and sex, BIA and DXA showed modality-specific associations with muscle strength. BIA was more strongly associated with handgrip strength, whereas DXA-derived height-adjusted indices were more strongly associated with lower limb strength. These findings support the tailored use of BIA and DXA in functional assessment, although neither method directly measures skeletal muscle mass.

Metabolism OpenVol. 32
Guiyang Medical University (CN), Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Jishuitan Hospital (CN), Hospital Conde S. Januário (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon