Universality under pressure: Why are Europeans increasingly selective in their solidarity with at‐risk social groups?

Abstract This paper develops the concept of selective solidarity, that is, differences in concern for the unemployed, the elderly, and the sick or disabled, by tracing its development over time and studying potential drivers. Using multilevel regression analysis on repeated cross‐sections from the European Values Study (1999/2001, 2008/2010, and 2017/2021) in 21 European countries, we test competing hypotheses on the erosive and restorative effects of conditional welfare policies and economic conditions. Findings show that solidarity has become increasingly selective: concern for the unemployed has declined while concern for the elderly and sick or disabled has grown. Conditional and selective policies appear to restore rather than erode solidarity, at least partially, by tempering the rise in selectivity. Moreover, higher unemployment rates are similarly associated with less selective solidarity. Ultimately, the very pressures that threaten solidarity may also contribute to its renewal, yet what places universalism under pressure remains an open question.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Welfare
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.70106
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Universality under pressure: Why are Europeans increasingly selective in their solidarity with at‐risk social groups?

Femke Roosma, Erwin Gielens
International Journal of Social Welfare
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Universality under pressure: Why are Europeans increasingly selective in their solidarity with at‐risk social groups?

Femke Roosma, Erwin Gielens
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper develops the concept of selective solidarity, that is, differences in concern for the unemployed, the elderly, and the sick or disabled, by tracing its development over time and studying potential drivers. Using multilevel regression analysis on repeated cross‐sections from the European Values Study (1999/2001, 2008/2010, and 2017/2021) in 21 European countries, we test competing hypotheses on the erosive and restorative effects of conditional welfare policies and economic conditions. Findings show that solidarity has become increasingly selective: concern for the unemployed has declined while concern for the elderly and sick or disabled has grown. Conditional and selective policies appear to restore rather than erode solidarity, at least partially, by tempering the rise in selectivity. Moreover, higher unemployment rates are similarly associated with less selective solidarity. Ultimately, the very pressures that threaten solidarity may also contribute to its renewal, yet what places universalism under pressure remains an open question.

International Journal of Social WelfareVol. 36(1)
Tilburg University (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Reduced inequalities, Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Universality under pressure: Why are Europeans increasingly selective in their solidarity with at‐risk social groups? — Femke Roosma, Erwin Gielens · International Journal of Social Welfare (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS