Comparative Outcomes of Surgical and Non-Surgical Treatment in Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Six-Month Analysis of Quality of Life and Functional Status

Background/Objectives: Lumbar radiculopathy can be managed non-surgically or surgically; however, comparative changes in quality of life and functional status between these treatment pathways remain clinically relevant. Therefore, this study aimed to compare six-month outcomes in patients treated non-surgically and those treated with lumbar microdiscectomy followed by rehabilitation. Methods: A prospective, non-randomized comparative cohort study included 100 patients with discogenic lumbar radiculopathy: 50 treated non-surgically and 50 treated by lumbar microdiscectomy. Both groups underwent medical rehabilitation and were assessed at admission, three months, and six months using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), including the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: PCS improved from 35.5 to 50.8 in the non-surgical group and from 28.8 to 49.2 in the surgical group. PCS was significantly higher in non-surgically treated patients at admission (p < 0.001) and three months (p < 0.05), whereas the difference was not significant at six months (p = 0.064). No between-group differences were found for MCS at admission, three months, or six months (p = 0.104, p = 0.871, and p = 0.323, respectively). ODI decreased from 51.5% to 22.5% in the non-surgical group and from 56.1% to 23.7% in the surgical group, without significant between-group differences at any assessment (p = 0.109, p = 0.162, and p = 0.427). Conclusions: Both treatment pathways were associated with substantial improvement. The initial between-group difference in physical quality of life diminished during follow-up, while mental quality of life and disability outcomes were similar between groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15218462
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Outcomes of Surgical and Non-Surgical Treatment in Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Six-Month Analysis of Quality of Life and Functional Status

Zana C. Dolicanin, Зоран Бајин, Elvis Mahmutović, Teodora Safiye et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Comparative Outcomes of Surgical and Non-Surgical Treatment in Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Six-Month Analysis of Quality of Life and Functional Status

Zana C. Dolicanin, Зоран Бајин, Elvis Mahmutović, Teodora Safiye, Emir Biševac, Aldina Ajdinović, Zerina Salihagić, Slaviša Minić, Almasa Sokolović, Medina Gusinac Bošnjak, Vesna Zeljković, Hristina Komatina
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Lumbar radiculopathy can be managed non-surgically or surgically; however, comparative changes in quality of life and functional status between these treatment pathways remain clinically relevant. Therefore, this study aimed to compare six-month outcomes in patients treated non-surgically and those treated with lumbar microdiscectomy followed by rehabilitation. Methods: A prospective, non-randomized comparative cohort study included 100 patients with discogenic lumbar radiculopathy: 50 treated non-surgically and 50 treated by lumbar microdiscectomy. Both groups underwent medical rehabilitation and were assessed at admission, three months, and six months using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), including the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: PCS improved from 35.5 to 50.8 in the non-surgical group and from 28.8 to 49.2 in the surgical group. PCS was significantly higher in non-surgically treated patients at admission (p < 0.001) and three months (p < 0.05), whereas the difference was not significant at six months (p = 0.064). No between-group differences were found for MCS at admission, three months, or six months (p = 0.104, p = 0.871, and p = 0.323, respectively). ODI decreased from 51.5% to 22.5% in the non-surgical group and from 56.1% to 23.7% in the surgical group, without significant between-group differences at any assessment (p = 0.109, p = 0.162, and p = 0.427). Conclusions: Both treatment pathways were associated with substantial improvement. The initial between-group difference in physical quality of life diminished during follow-up, while mental quality of life and disability outcomes were similar between groups.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(21)
State University of Novi Pazar (RS)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon