“Politics Is Interfering Where It Should Not”: Healthcare Professionals’ Responses to Brazil’s New Regulation of Gender-Affirming Care

Abstract Introduction Gender-affirming care for transgender children and adolescents has become increasingly contested following recent regulatory changes. Although public and regulatory debates have largely focused on medical interventions, less is known about how healthcare professionals understand and enact care within changing regulatory contexts. This study explored professionals’ perspectives on gender-affirming care, transition, and the implications of Brazil’s Federal Council of Medicine Resolution No. 2,427/2025. Methods A qualitative study was conducted using four online focus groups, held between January and March 2026, with 15 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals involved in the care of transgender children and adolescents in Brazil. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis combining deductive and inductive approaches. Results Professionals described gender-affirming care as a longitudinal, relational, multidisciplinary, and intersectoral process extending beyond medical interventions to include family support, school collaboration, psychosocial care, and advocacy. Participants perceived the resolution as misaligned with this model of care and described divergent interpretations of its transitional provision, resulting in heterogeneous practices regarding treatment eligibility and continuity. They also reported increased legal involvement, psychosocial demands, regulatory uncertainty, and concerns about self-medication and unsupervised hormone use. Conclusions Professionals experienced the resolution not only as a restriction on medical interventions but as a disruption of a longitudinal model of care, with heterogeneous implementation across services and a shift of clinical work toward legal, psychosocial, and harm-reduction demands. Policy Implications Regulatory frameworks should recognize the multidimensional nature of gender-affirming care, provide clear implementation guidance, protect continuity of care, and incorporate the perspectives of healthcare professionals, transgender young people, and their families.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11542263/v1
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

“Politics Is Interfering Where It Should Not”: Healthcare Professionals’ Responses to Brazil’s New Regulation of Gender-Affirming Care

Breno Artuso Lage, Igor Longobardi, Hamilton Roschel, Fernanda Baeza Scagliusi et al.
5 links
Research Square
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
preprint

“Politics Is Interfering Where It Should Not”: Healthcare Professionals’ Responses to Brazil’s New Regulation of Gender-Affirming Care

Breno Artuso Lage, Igor Longobardi, Hamilton Roschel, Fernanda Baeza Scagliusi, Bruna Caruso Mazzolani, Bruno Gualano, Fernanda Sabatini, Alexandre Saadeh, Luana Cordeiro de Oliveira, Fernanda Evangelista Bandeira de Melo, Thifany Helena Torres, Samuel Bittar, Lucas Arantes da Silva, Mariana de Mattos Baratojo
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Gender-affirming care for transgender children and adolescents has become increasingly contested following recent regulatory changes. Although public and regulatory debates have largely focused on medical interventions, less is known about how healthcare professionals understand and enact care within changing regulatory contexts. This study explored professionals’ perspectives on gender-affirming care, transition, and the implications of Brazil’s Federal Council of Medicine Resolution No. 2,427/2025. Methods A qualitative study was conducted using four online focus groups, held between January and March 2026, with 15 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals involved in the care of transgender children and adolescents in Brazil. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis combining deductive and inductive approaches. Results Professionals described gender-affirming care as a longitudinal, relational, multidisciplinary, and intersectoral process extending beyond medical interventions to include family support, school collaboration, psychosocial care, and advocacy. Participants perceived the resolution as misaligned with this model of care and described divergent interpretations of its transitional provision, resulting in heterogeneous practices regarding treatment eligibility and continuity. They also reported increased legal involvement, psychosocial demands, regulatory uncertainty, and concerns about self-medication and unsupervised hormone use. Conclusions Professionals experienced the resolution not only as a restriction on medical interventions but as a disruption of a longitudinal model of care, with heterogeneous implementation across services and a shift of clinical work toward legal, psychosocial, and harm-reduction demands. Policy Implications Regulatory frameworks should recognize the multidimensional nature of gender-affirming care, provide clear implementation guidance, protect continuity of care, and incorporate the perspectives of healthcare professionals, transgender young people, and their families.

Research Square
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Gender equality
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon