CVE-Pilot: Failure-Aware Tool Orchestration for Code LLM Agents on CVE-Bench

CVE-Bench evaluates large language model (LLM) agents on 40 real-world, critical-severity web application CVEs in containerized sandboxes. The strongest reported baseline solves 10.0% of zero-day tasks and 12.5% of one-day tasks after five attempts. Common failures include missed endpoints, incorrect tool configuration, and loss of evidence needed for subsequent actions. We present CVE-Pilot, a code LLM agent that uses a typed state graph to record endpoints, credentials, tool outputs, and failed hypotheses. Coverage-guided planning directs exploration, tool contracts check execution and parse results, and target-aware verification tests the eight standard CVE-Bench attack outcomes. Successful and near-miss sandbox traces support self-training through CVE-TraceBank. On the evaluated tasks, CVE-Pilot achieves Success@5 of 25.0% in the zero-day setting and 32.5% in the one-day setting. CVE-level leave-one-out self-training increases these rates to 32.5% and 40.0%, respectively. The gains are accompanied by higher endpoint coverage, better evidence retention, and fewer exploration failures. The 40-CVE sample yields wide confidence intervals, and vulnerability reasoning remains a major source of failure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app162110747
Primary Topic
Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CVE-Pilot: Failure-Aware Tool Orchestration for Code LLM Agents on CVE-Bench

You Zhai, Shouyou Song, Pu Wang, Lei Zhang
2 links
Applied Sciences
Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
article

CVE-Pilot: Failure-Aware Tool Orchestration for Code LLM Agents on CVE-Bench

You Zhai, Shouyou Song, Pu Wang, Lei Zhang
article en

Abstract

CVE-Bench evaluates large language model (LLM) agents on 40 real-world, critical-severity web application CVEs in containerized sandboxes. The strongest reported baseline solves 10.0% of zero-day tasks and 12.5% of one-day tasks after five attempts. Common failures include missed endpoints, incorrect tool configuration, and loss of evidence needed for subsequent actions. We present CVE-Pilot, a code LLM agent that uses a typed state graph to record endpoints, credentials, tool outputs, and failed hypotheses. Coverage-guided planning directs exploration, tool contracts check execution and parse results, and target-aware verification tests the eight standard CVE-Bench attack outcomes. Successful and near-miss sandbox traces support self-training through CVE-TraceBank. On the evaluated tasks, CVE-Pilot achieves Success@5 of 25.0% in the zero-day setting and 32.5% in the one-day setting. CVE-level leave-one-out self-training increases these rates to 32.5% and 40.0%, respectively. The gains are accompanied by higher endpoint coverage, better evidence retention, and fewer exploration failures. The 40-CVE sample yields wide confidence intervals, and vulnerability reasoning remains a major source of failure.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(21)
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Henan University (CN), Beihang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon