Long-term outcomes and interval cancers after endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps

Background Data on the short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large colorectal polyps are essential for guiding treatment algorithms. Objective To evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of EMR for large rectal and colonic polyps. Design We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent EMR for colorectal polyps ≥20 mm at a single tertiary centre between 2000 and 2020. Procedures were performed by 15 colonoscopists. Data were retrieved from hospital records and the National Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC; median follow-up 9.1 years). The main secondary outcome was recurrence risk, assessed in patients with available follow-up data (71.2% follow-up rate; median follow-up, 15.5 months). Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse these long-term outcomes. Candidate confounders included age, sex, lesion size, morphology, location (rectum vs colon), prior treatment, technical failure, resection technique (en bloc vs piecemeal) and grade of dysplasia or invasive cancer. Results A total of 2413 lesions in 2205 patients were analysed; 26.3% were rectal and 73.7% colonic. Overall, 27.3% of lesions were pedunculated, 27.5% sessile and 45.2% flat. Rectal lesions more often harboured invasive cancer (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.37; p=0.005), an association driven predominantly by laterally spreading lesions (OR 5.20, 95% CI 2.68 to 10.09). Rectal location was independently associated with recurrence (16.6% vs 6.9% for colonic lesions; HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.08; p=0.002), and recurrence was a strong predictor of PCCRC (2.4% vs 0.9% for colonic lesions; HR 10.32, 95% CI 4.59 to 23.20; p<0.001). In contrast, rectal location was not an independent predictor of PCCRC. Conclusion Large rectal lesions were more likely to harbour invasive cancer and carried a higher risk of recurrence. Although recurrence independently predicted PCCRC, rectal location alone did not.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gut
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2025-337068
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term outcomes and interval cancers after endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps

Jacek Pachlewski, Piotr Spychalski, Maciej Rupiński, Tomasz Rawa et al.
Gut
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Long-term outcomes and interval cancers after endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps

Jacek Pachlewski, Piotr Spychalski, Maciej Rupiński, Tomasz Rawa, Nastazja Pilonis, Władysław Januszewicz, Janina Kowalik, Jarosław Reguła, Jarek Kobiela, Andrzej Mróz, Wojciech Korcz, Jakub Krzyżkowiak, Katarzyna Połomska, Magdalena Prud, Michal Filip Kamiński, Weronika Reluga, Anna Gołębiewska
article en

Abstract

Background Data on the short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large colorectal polyps are essential for guiding treatment algorithms. Objective To evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of EMR for large rectal and colonic polyps. Design We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent EMR for colorectal polyps ≥20 mm at a single tertiary centre between 2000 and 2020. Procedures were performed by 15 colonoscopists. Data were retrieved from hospital records and the National Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC; median follow-up 9.1 years). The main secondary outcome was recurrence risk, assessed in patients with available follow-up data (71.2% follow-up rate; median follow-up, 15.5 months). Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse these long-term outcomes. Candidate confounders included age, sex, lesion size, morphology, location (rectum vs colon), prior treatment, technical failure, resection technique (en bloc vs piecemeal) and grade of dysplasia or invasive cancer. Results A total of 2413 lesions in 2205 patients were analysed; 26.3% were rectal and 73.7% colonic. Overall, 27.3% of lesions were pedunculated, 27.5% sessile and 45.2% flat. Rectal lesions more often harboured invasive cancer (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.37; p=0.005), an association driven predominantly by laterally spreading lesions (OR 5.20, 95% CI 2.68 to 10.09). Rectal location was independently associated with recurrence (16.6% vs 6.9% for colonic lesions; HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.08; p=0.002), and recurrence was a strong predictor of PCCRC (2.4% vs 0.9% for colonic lesions; HR 10.32, 95% CI 4.59 to 23.20; p<0.001). In contrast, rectal location was not an independent predictor of PCCRC. Conclusion Large rectal lesions were more likely to harbour invasive cancer and carried a higher risk of recurrence. Although recurrence independently predicted PCCRC, rectal location alone did not.

Gut
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL), Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
European Commission, Agencja Badań Medycznych, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon