Does the Belt and Road Initiative reduce poverty? Evaluating grain trade openness as an intermediate policy outcome

Introduction Eradicating poverty remains a core objective of global sustainable development. While the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) provides a novel paradigm for inclusive growth, existing evaluations predominantly focus on macroeconomic aggregates, often overlooking the micro-level transmission mechanisms within the agricultural sector. Methods Leveraging the BRI as a quasi-natural experiment, this study applies a two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences (TWFE-DID) model to a panel of 131 countries from 2000 to 2023. We evaluate the initiative’s causal effect on poverty in participating countries and examine its underlying pathways. Results Our findings are threefold. First, by addressing potential “bad control” biases through a specification hierarchy, the baseline estimates indicate that the BRI significantly mitigates absolute poverty by reducing both the poverty headcount ratio and the poverty gap. Second, using a price-adjusted measure, we identify real grain trade openness as a critical intermediate policy outcome that facilitates this poverty-reducing effect. Third, the impacts exhibit significant heterogeneity: driven by an “export-led poverty reduction” pathway, the BRI’s efficacy is more pronounced in pre-treatment net grain-exporting countries compared to net importers. Discussion Furthermore, empirical tests suggest a potential institutional “substitution effect,” where poverty-reducing dividends tend to be larger in countries with low initial infrastructure and weaker historical governance. This tentatively supports a bureaucracy-bypass conjecture, suggesting that external resources can deliver direct marginal benefits to vulnerable populations in institutionally constrained nations. This study provides empirical evidence for developing nations leveraging international agricultural trade for poverty alleviation and offers policy insights for the high-quality development of the BRI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1992067
Primary Topic
Belt and Road Initiative
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the Belt and Road Initiative reduce poverty? Evaluating grain trade openness as an intermediate policy outcome

Zeqin Liu, Haowen Cheng
1 links
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Belt and Road Initiative
article

Does the Belt and Road Initiative reduce poverty? Evaluating grain trade openness as an intermediate policy outcome

Zeqin Liu, Haowen Cheng
article en

Abstract

Introduction Eradicating poverty remains a core objective of global sustainable development. While the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) provides a novel paradigm for inclusive growth, existing evaluations predominantly focus on macroeconomic aggregates, often overlooking the micro-level transmission mechanisms within the agricultural sector. Methods Leveraging the BRI as a quasi-natural experiment, this study applies a two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences (TWFE-DID) model to a panel of 131 countries from 2000 to 2023. We evaluate the initiative’s causal effect on poverty in participating countries and examine its underlying pathways. Results Our findings are threefold. First, by addressing potential “bad control” biases through a specification hierarchy, the baseline estimates indicate that the BRI significantly mitigates absolute poverty by reducing both the poverty headcount ratio and the poverty gap. Second, using a price-adjusted measure, we identify real grain trade openness as a critical intermediate policy outcome that facilitates this poverty-reducing effect. Third, the impacts exhibit significant heterogeneity: driven by an “export-led poverty reduction” pathway, the BRI’s efficacy is more pronounced in pre-treatment net grain-exporting countries compared to net importers. Discussion Furthermore, empirical tests suggest a potential institutional “substitution effect,” where poverty-reducing dividends tend to be larger in countries with low initial infrastructure and weaker historical governance. This tentatively supports a bureaucracy-bypass conjecture, suggesting that external resources can deliver direct marginal benefits to vulnerable populations in institutionally constrained nations. This study provides empirical evidence for developing nations leveraging international agricultural trade for poverty alleviation and offers policy insights for the high-quality development of the BRI.

Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsVol. 10
North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering (CN)
No poverty, Reduced inequalities, Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Zero hunger, Decent work and economic growth, Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Belt and Road Initiative
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Does the Belt and Road Initiative reduce poverty? Evaluating grain trade openness as an intermediate policy outcome — Zeqin Liu, Haowen Cheng · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS