What Can Be Computed with Indefinite Causal Structure?

Can quantum computation become more powerful when operations do not need to follow a definite causal order? We study this question in the process matrix formalism of Oreshkov et al. (Nature Communications, 2012), which allows quantum operations to be connected without a fixed global order. In the computational model, a quantum circuit succinctly describes a process matrix, and the algorithm is given access to its generated channel, with computational cost measured by the size of the generating circuit. We give polynomial-time algorithms in two settings. First, general process matrix computation suffices to solve every problem in $\textbf{NP}$. The valid processes used by our algorithm satisfy the purification postulate of Araújo et al. (Quantum, 2017), and their generated channels are unitary, although their generating circuits are not. Second, requiring the process matrices themselves to be pure, we give a polynomial-time algorithm for unique-sink orientation, a general problem capturing several longstanding computational problems in optimization. Our unitary generators are constructed explicitly and efficiently. Assuming that unique-sink orientation has no quantum polynomial-time algorithm, our result shows that indefinite causal order can provide computational power beyond $\textbf{BQP}$ within the process matrix formalism, even while preserving unitarity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.40573
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

What Can Be Computed with Indefinite Causal Structure?

Omri Shmueli
arXiv (Cornell University)
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
preprint

What Can Be Computed with Indefinite Causal Structure?

Omri Shmueli
preprint en

Abstract

Can quantum computation become more powerful when operations do not need to follow a definite causal order? We study this question in the process matrix formalism of Oreshkov et al. (Nature Communications, 2012), which allows quantum operations to be connected without a fixed global order. In the computational model, a quantum circuit succinctly describes a process matrix, and the algorithm is given access to its generated channel, with computational cost measured by the size of the generating circuit. We give polynomial-time algorithms in two settings. First, general process matrix computation suffices to solve every problem in $\textbf{NP}$. The valid processes used by our algorithm satisfy the purification postulate of Araújo et al. (Quantum, 2017), and their generated channels are unitary, although their generating circuits are not. Second, requiring the process matrices themselves to be pure, we give a polynomial-time algorithm for unique-sink orientation, a general problem capturing several longstanding computational problems in optimization. Our unitary generators are constructed explicitly and efficiently. Assuming that unique-sink orientation has no quantum polynomial-time algorithm, our result shows that indefinite causal order can provide computational power beyond $\textbf{BQP}$ within the process matrix formalism, even while preserving unitarity.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
What Can Be Computed with Indefinite Causal Structure? — Omri Shmueli · arXiv (Cornell University) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS