A Study on the geoeffective event of 11 April 2022

Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) are the main drivers of geomagnetic storms. Studying their initial phases is important for understanding their propagation through the heliosphere and the effects they have on the Space Weather. In this work, as a case study, we investigate how SolO/Metis observations improve the accuracy in modelling a geoeffective CME that occurred on 11 April 2022. This event caused a geomagnetic storm of intensity of −81 nT in terms of Disturbance Storm Time (Dst) on 14 April 2022. This moderately geoeffective event serves as a challenging case to model and understand the complex interactions of CMEs with the ambient solar wind. Using coronagraphic data from SOHO/LASCO C2, STEREO/SECCHI COR2-A along with VL observations from SolO/Metis, a Graduated Cylindrical Shell (GCS) analysis was done for 3D reconstruction of the CME flux rope. This provided the input parameters required for running the physics-based propagation models (DBM and DBEM, WSA-Enlil and EUHFORIA) which we have used to calculate the CME arrival times at Earth. SolO/Metis provides an additional viewpoint for the above analysis leading to a more precise determination of the GCS parameters and the 3D speed of the CME. By constraining the initial parameters, the 3D MHD models better resolve the interaction of the CME with the ambient solar wind. Including SolO/Metis data for this particular event leads to a lower error in the predicted arrival times at Earth for WSAEnlil and EUHFORIA (≈ 3 hours) than the typical ≈ 8–10 hours error estimates found in literature. Plain Language Summary Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) are large expulsions of plasma and magnetic field from the Sun. When directed towards Earth, these can affect the space environment around Earth. Accurate predictions of the arrival time of CMEs is therefore important to mitigate their effects. In this work, we chose a case study of a CME that erupted on April 11, 2022 and caused a moderate geomagnetic storm at Earth two days later, on April 13. The CME was observed by a constellation of spacecraft from different view points, which allowed building a 3D model of the CME during its initial evolution. We then employed three physics-based models to evaluate how the CME interacted and propagated through the ambient solar wind medium. We were then able to demonstrate the crucial role of the initial 3D model of the CME obtained from multi-viewpoint observations in improving the accuracy of the predictions of the arrival time at Earth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.15011348/v1
Primary Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A Study on the geoeffective event of 11 April 2022

Marco Romoli, A. Burtovoi, Manuela Temmer, F. Frassati et al.
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
preprint

A Study on the geoeffective event of 11 April 2022

Marco Romoli, A. Burtovoi, Manuela Temmer, F. Frassati, L. Abbo, M. Pancrazzi, Yara De Leo, G. Jerse, C. Sasso, Roberto Susino, M. Giarrusso, Preity Sukla Sahani, Federico Landini, V. Andretta, G. Russano
preprint en

Abstract

Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) are the main drivers of geomagnetic storms. Studying their initial phases is important for understanding their propagation through the heliosphere and the effects they have on the Space Weather. In this work, as a case study, we investigate how SolO/Metis observations improve the accuracy in modelling a geoeffective CME that occurred on 11 April 2022. This event caused a geomagnetic storm of intensity of −81 nT in terms of Disturbance Storm Time (Dst) on 14 April 2022. This moderately geoeffective event serves as a challenging case to model and understand the complex interactions of CMEs with the ambient solar wind. Using coronagraphic data from SOHO/LASCO C2, STEREO/SECCHI COR2-A along with VL observations from SolO/Metis, a Graduated Cylindrical Shell (GCS) analysis was done for 3D reconstruction of the CME flux rope. This provided the input parameters required for running the physics-based propagation models (DBM and DBEM, WSA-Enlil and EUHFORIA) which we have used to calculate the CME arrival times at Earth. SolO/Metis provides an additional viewpoint for the above analysis leading to a more precise determination of the GCS parameters and the 3D speed of the CME. By constraining the initial parameters, the 3D MHD models better resolve the interaction of the CME with the ambient solar wind. Including SolO/Metis data for this particular event leads to a lower error in the predicted arrival times at Earth for WSAEnlil and EUHFORIA (≈ 3 hours) than the typical ≈ 8–10 hours error estimates found in literature. Plain Language Summary Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) are large expulsions of plasma and magnetic field from the Sun. When directed towards Earth, these can affect the space environment around Earth. Accurate predictions of the arrival time of CMEs is therefore important to mitigate their effects. In this work, we chose a case study of a CME that erupted on April 11, 2022 and caused a moderate geomagnetic storm at Earth two days later, on April 13. The CME was observed by a constellation of spacecraft from different view points, which allowed building a 3D model of the CME during its initial evolution. We then employed three physics-based models to evaluate how the CME interacted and propagated through the ambient solar wind medium. We were then able to demonstrate the crucial role of the initial 3D model of the CME obtained from multi-viewpoint observations in improving the accuracy of the predictions of the arrival time at Earth.

University of Graz (AT), Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory (IT), Trieste Astronomical Observatory (IT), Astronomical Observatory of Capodimonte (IT), Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino (IT), Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania (IT), University of Florence (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT), National Institute for Astrophysics (IT)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Austrian Science Fund, Goddard Space Flight Center
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon