COMPARISON OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ANTI HYPERTENSIVE DRUG COMBINATIONS (DIURETICS, CCBS, ARBS, BETA BLOCKERS,) IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Aim: Persistent hypertension increases the likelihood of cardiovascular events and kidney complications. If one medicine does not provide sufficient control, clinicians may prescribe a combination of antihypertensive agents. Decisions about therapy should account for blood-pressure response as well as tolerability. Objective: This study examined changes in blood pressure and serum creatinine during follow-up, the proportion of patients meeting the recorded blood-pressure target, and adverse effects documented for selected antihypertensive regimens. Methods and Methodology: A prospective observational study lasting six months was carried out at Aditya Nursing Home in Adoni, Andhra Pradesh. Records for 79 adults aged 35–95 years receiving inpatient or outpatient hypertension care were analysed. Information was abstracted from prescriptions, clinical documentation, laboratory results, and blood-pressure measurements. Assessments were documented at baseline and at follow-up, including visits at about one and three months. The project identified paired t-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) as the planned analyses; individual patient data were not available to repeat these calculations independently. Results And Discussion: Both systolic and diastolic readings were lower at follow-up across all five regimens: telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine/atenolol, telmisartan/amlodipine, telmisartan/chlorthalidone, and telmisartan/metoprolol succinate. The recorded systolic reduction was 40 mmHg for telmisartan/amlodipine (160 to 120 mmHg) and for telmisartan/chlorthalidone (180 to 140 mmHg). Average serum creatinine showed relatively small changes, with increases noted in the two groups receiving diuretics. According to the target-control table, 67 of 79 participants (84.8%) met the stated target. However, treatment-group totals are inconsistent across tables and must be checked against the original records. Conclusion: The project tables indicate lower follow-up blood pressure in each of the five treatment groups. A substantial systolic change was recorded for telmisartan/amlodipine, while mean creatinine rose slightly in some groups treated with diuretics. Given the observational design and unresolved discrepancies in the tables, these findings should be viewed as descriptive and cannot establish that one combination is better than another.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23801660
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ANTI HYPERTENSIVE DRUG COMBINATIONS (DIURETICS, CCBS, ARBS, BETA BLOCKERS,) IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

K. Pavithra1*, R. Jenelia Williams1, Dr. C. Venkatesh2, Dr. N. M. Vageesh3, Dr. B. Srinivasulu4
European Journal Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

COMPARISON OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ANTI HYPERTENSIVE DRUG COMBINATIONS (DIURETICS, CCBS, ARBS, BETA BLOCKERS,) IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

K. Pavithra1*, R. Jenelia Williams1, Dr. C. Venkatesh2, Dr. N. M. Vageesh3, Dr. B. Srinivasulu4
article en

Abstract

Aim: Persistent hypertension increases the likelihood of cardiovascular events and kidney complications. If one medicine does not provide sufficient control, clinicians may prescribe a combination of antihypertensive agents. Decisions about therapy should account for blood-pressure response as well as tolerability. Objective: This study examined changes in blood pressure and serum creatinine during follow-up, the proportion of patients meeting the recorded blood-pressure target, and adverse effects documented for selected antihypertensive regimens. Methods and Methodology: A prospective observational study lasting six months was carried out at Aditya Nursing Home in Adoni, Andhra Pradesh. Records for 79 adults aged 35–95 years receiving inpatient or outpatient hypertension care were analysed. Information was abstracted from prescriptions, clinical documentation, laboratory results, and blood-pressure measurements. Assessments were documented at baseline and at follow-up, including visits at about one and three months. The project identified paired t-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) as the planned analyses; individual patient data were not available to repeat these calculations independently. Results And Discussion: Both systolic and diastolic readings were lower at follow-up across all five regimens: telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine/atenolol, telmisartan/amlodipine, telmisartan/chlorthalidone, and telmisartan/metoprolol succinate. The recorded systolic reduction was 40 mmHg for telmisartan/amlodipine (160 to 120 mmHg) and for telmisartan/chlorthalidone (180 to 140 mmHg). Average serum creatinine showed relatively small changes, with increases noted in the two groups receiving diuretics. According to the target-control table, 67 of 79 participants (84.8%) met the stated target. However, treatment-group totals are inconsistent across tables and must be checked against the original records. Conclusion: The project tables indicate lower follow-up blood pressure in each of the five treatment groups. A substantial systolic change was recorded for telmisartan/amlodipine, while mean creatinine rose slightly in some groups treated with diuretics. Given the observational design and unresolved discrepancies in the tables, these findings should be viewed as descriptive and cannot establish that one combination is better than another.

European Journal Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon