From Compliance to Responsible AI: A Bibliometric Study on Educational Data Governance and Student Privacy (2015-2025)

This study maps the development of research on educational data governance and student privacy between 2015 and 2025. It follows the structure of a bibliometric trend review and uses a Scopus-derived record set of 313 articles to analyze the analytical workflow, including annual output, keyword co-occurrence, thematic evolution, policy turning points, and research collaboration. The study is guided by three questions: how the volume of research changed, how the dominant vocabulary moved from learning analytics and ownership to compliance and responsible artificial intelligence, and which problems remained unresolved across the period. The results show five connected phases. From 2015 to 2017, research was organized around learning analytics, educational data mining, student tracking, data ownership, and informed consent. After the General Data Protection Regulation became applicable on May 25, 2018, the literature moved toward data protection, compliance, governance frameworks, and institutional responsibility. The COVID-19 period increased attention to remote learning privacy, online proctoring, surveillance, and vendor data sharing. From late 2022, generative artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, algorithmic bias, ethical artificial intelligence, and artificial intelligence literacy became central. The 2024-2025 frontier connected responsible artificial intelligence with high-risk education systems, human oversight, auditability, and data minimization in large language models. The study argues that compliance is necessary but insufficient. A mature governance model must connect legal duties, institutional processes, technical controls, and educational judgment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business System & Innovation Journal
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.67955/bsij.v1i3.29
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Compliance to Responsible AI: A Bibliometric Study on Educational Data Governance and Student Privacy (2015-2025)

Weijian Kong, Yundong Wu, Tingting Lv, Ying Chen et al.
2 links
Business System & Innovation Journal
Online Learning and Analytics
article

From Compliance to Responsible AI: A Bibliometric Study on Educational Data Governance and Student Privacy (2015-2025)

Weijian Kong, Yundong Wu, Tingting Lv, Ying Chen, Shun Guo, Ruofan Lin, Jiani Wu, Yuxuan Chen
article en

Abstract

This study maps the development of research on educational data governance and student privacy between 2015 and 2025. It follows the structure of a bibliometric trend review and uses a Scopus-derived record set of 313 articles to analyze the analytical workflow, including annual output, keyword co-occurrence, thematic evolution, policy turning points, and research collaboration. The study is guided by three questions: how the volume of research changed, how the dominant vocabulary moved from learning analytics and ownership to compliance and responsible artificial intelligence, and which problems remained unresolved across the period. The results show five connected phases. From 2015 to 2017, research was organized around learning analytics, educational data mining, student tracking, data ownership, and informed consent. After the General Data Protection Regulation became applicable on May 25, 2018, the literature moved toward data protection, compliance, governance frameworks, and institutional responsibility. The COVID-19 period increased attention to remote learning privacy, online proctoring, surveillance, and vendor data sharing. From late 2022, generative artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, algorithmic bias, ethical artificial intelligence, and artificial intelligence literacy became central. The 2024-2025 frontier connected responsible artificial intelligence with high-risk education systems, human oversight, auditability, and data minimization in large language models. The study argues that compliance is necessary but insufficient. A mature governance model must connect legal duties, institutional processes, technical controls, and educational judgment.

Business System & Innovation JournalVol. 1(3)
Higher Education, Psychology, and Policy Analysis Laboratory (KR)
Quality education, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon