BigpictureQC: multi-stain, multi-species artifact segmentation for whole-slide quality control

Abstract Background Artifacts in digital pathology whole-slide images (WSIs) cause diagnostic delay and quality issues, yet quality control (QC) in most pathology laboratories remains manual, subjective, and difficult to scale. We present BigpictureQC, a deep learning framework for WSI quality assessment based on per-class pixel-level segmentation of six visually distinct artifact and marking classes. Methods BigpictureQC was trained on 268 WSIs from five data sources and evaluated on >9,200 WSIs spanning human and preclinical samples, diverse tissue types, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical (IHC) stains, and multiple scanner models. Patch-level segmentation was evaluated on 569 WSIs from seven independent cohorts using the Dice similarity coefficient for pixel-level segmentation; slide-level artifact detection was assessed on an independent dataset of 315 dermatopathology WSIs using F1 scores. A quantitative slide-level quality score was derived from artifact coverage and evaluated against manual quality ratings using Spearman rank correlation and AUC. Clinical impact was evaluated in a retrospective cohort of 3,686 diagnostic slides with technician rescan decisions and a prospective cohort of 4,426 unreviewed slides from routine diagnostics. Results BigpictureQC achieved a mean Dice score of 0.93 on the evaluation set, outperforming academic and commercial baselines across all artifact classes and domains (H&E, IHC, clinical, preclinical). Slide-level artifact detection yielded a micro-averaged F1 score of 0.93. The derived quality score strongly correlated with manual ratings and achieved an AUC of 0.978 for identifying poor-quality slides. In clinical workflow analyses, automated quality control identified 93% of poor-quality slides, compared with 35% detected by routine manual inspection. In the prospective-style cohort, 8.2% of slides were identified as having substantial quality issues that would otherwise have reached pathologists without prior review. Conclusions BigpictureQC provides the first publicly available automated QC framework validated across human and preclinical digital pathology, encompassing multiple tissue types, H&E and IHC stains, and diverse scanner models. It substantially outperforms existing manual and automated approaches in detecting poor-quality slides, and demonstrates strong potential to improve laboratory efficiency by enabling systematic pre-screening of all digitized slides at the point of scanning. The code, inference pipeline and trained model weights are publicly released.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-05257-1
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BigpictureQC: multi-stain, multi-species artifact segmentation for whole-slide quality control

Erio Barale-Thomas, Pieter Van Nuffel, Ilse Slootweg, Hölger Hoefling et al.
3 links
BMC Medicine
AI in cancer detection
article

BigpictureQC: multi-stain, multi-species artifact segmentation for whole-slide quality control

Erio Barale-Thomas, Pieter Van Nuffel, Ilse Slootweg, Hölger Hoefling, Geert J. S. Litjens, Freya Molenberghs, Sara Rombouts, Anna Bodén, Jeroen A. W. M. van der Laak, Francesco Ciompi, Marina D'Amato, Paul van Diest, Nikolas Stathonikos
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Artifacts in digital pathology whole-slide images (WSIs) cause diagnostic delay and quality issues, yet quality control (QC) in most pathology laboratories remains manual, subjective, and difficult to scale. We present BigpictureQC, a deep learning framework for WSI quality assessment based on per-class pixel-level segmentation of six visually distinct artifact and marking classes. Methods BigpictureQC was trained on 268 WSIs from five data sources and evaluated on >9,200 WSIs spanning human and preclinical samples, diverse tissue types, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical (IHC) stains, and multiple scanner models. Patch-level segmentation was evaluated on 569 WSIs from seven independent cohorts using the Dice similarity coefficient for pixel-level segmentation; slide-level artifact detection was assessed on an independent dataset of 315 dermatopathology WSIs using F1 scores. A quantitative slide-level quality score was derived from artifact coverage and evaluated against manual quality ratings using Spearman rank correlation and AUC. Clinical impact was evaluated in a retrospective cohort of 3,686 diagnostic slides with technician rescan decisions and a prospective cohort of 4,426 unreviewed slides from routine diagnostics. Results BigpictureQC achieved a mean Dice score of 0.93 on the evaluation set, outperforming academic and commercial baselines across all artifact classes and domains (H&E, IHC, clinical, preclinical). Slide-level artifact detection yielded a micro-averaged F1 score of 0.93. The derived quality score strongly correlated with manual ratings and achieved an AUC of 0.978 for identifying poor-quality slides. In clinical workflow analyses, automated quality control identified 93% of poor-quality slides, compared with 35% detected by routine manual inspection. In the prospective-style cohort, 8.2% of slides were identified as having substantial quality issues that would otherwise have reached pathologists without prior review. Conclusions BigpictureQC provides the first publicly available automated QC framework validated across human and preclinical digital pathology, encompassing multiple tissue types, H&E and IHC stains, and diverse scanner models. It substantially outperforms existing manual and automated approaches in detecting poor-quality slides, and demonstrates strong potential to improve laboratory efficiency by enabling systematic pre-screening of all digitized slides at the point of scanning. The code, inference pipeline and trained model weights are publicly released.

BMC Medicine
Linköping University (SE), Novartis (Switzerland) (CH), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Oncode Institute (NL), Region Östergötland (SE), UCB Pharma (Belgium) (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon