Assessing Sustainable Intensification Options for Maize Across Diverse Farm Types in Central Malawi

Smallholder farming systems in Sub-Saharan Africa are heterogeneous in resource endowment and livelihood objectives, posing challenges for effective agricultural interventions. This study characterises farm system diversity in Mtunthama Extension Planning Area, Kasungu District, Malawi, and evaluates the suitability of sustainable intensification innovations across farm types. Data were collected through focus group discussions and household surveys involving 43 farming households. Maize was the focus crop because it is the staple food crop of the whole of Malawi and the crop with which legumes are rotated or intercropped in the sustainable intensification options evaluated. Principal Component Analysis was used to construct a farm typology, while innovation suitability was assessed using a multi-criteria decision analysis framework. Four distinct farm types were identified: High-Resource-Endowed farms (HRE), Moderately resource-endowed farms with Diversified Cropping systems (MDV), Moderately resource-endowed farms with Mixed crop-livestock orientation (MCL), and Resource-Constrained Maize-dominated farms (RCM). The multi-criteria assessment revealed substantial variation in suitability across types. Conservation agriculture recorded the highest overall score (0.68), followed by intercropping (0.54), while strip cropping showed the lowest (0.25). MDV achieved the highest overall innovation score (0.66), whereas MCL and RCM showed limited uptake. These findings demonstrate that sustainable intensification effectiveness is shaped by resource endowment and trade-offs between productivity, income, and sustainability. The decoupling of maize yield and household income suggests intensification pathways are context-specific. The framework provides a useful approach for identifying suitable practice combinations for each farm type and for designing targeted interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su182111065
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Sustainable Intensification Options for Maize Across Diverse Farm Types in Central Malawi

Santiago López‐Ridaura, Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, J.C.J. Groot, Mazvita Sheila Chiduwa et al.
1 links
Sustainability
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Assessing Sustainable Intensification Options for Maize Across Diverse Farm Types in Central Malawi

Santiago López‐Ridaura, Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, J.C.J. Groot, Mazvita Sheila Chiduwa, Florence Kamwana-Ngwira
article en

Abstract

Smallholder farming systems in Sub-Saharan Africa are heterogeneous in resource endowment and livelihood objectives, posing challenges for effective agricultural interventions. This study characterises farm system diversity in Mtunthama Extension Planning Area, Kasungu District, Malawi, and evaluates the suitability of sustainable intensification innovations across farm types. Data were collected through focus group discussions and household surveys involving 43 farming households. Maize was the focus crop because it is the staple food crop of the whole of Malawi and the crop with which legumes are rotated or intercropped in the sustainable intensification options evaluated. Principal Component Analysis was used to construct a farm typology, while innovation suitability was assessed using a multi-criteria decision analysis framework. Four distinct farm types were identified: High-Resource-Endowed farms (HRE), Moderately resource-endowed farms with Diversified Cropping systems (MDV), Moderately resource-endowed farms with Mixed crop-livestock orientation (MCL), and Resource-Constrained Maize-dominated farms (RCM). The multi-criteria assessment revealed substantial variation in suitability across types. Conservation agriculture recorded the highest overall score (0.68), followed by intercropping (0.54), while strip cropping showed the lowest (0.25). MDV achieved the highest overall innovation score (0.66), whereas MCL and RCM showed limited uptake. These findings demonstrate that sustainable intensification effectiveness is shaped by resource endowment and trade-offs between productivity, income, and sustainability. The decoupling of maize yield and household income suggests intensification pathways are context-specific. The framework provides a useful approach for identifying suitable practice combinations for each farm type and for designing targeted interventions.

SustainabilityVol. 18(21)
Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (KE), Wageningen University & Research (NL), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Zero hunger, Industry, innovation and infrastructure, No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon