Association Between Cardiologist Ambulatory Workload and Evidence‐Based Therapy for Heart Failure

Background Most eligible patients are not prescribed guideline‐directed medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF). Increased time pressures for providers in the ambulatory setting may contribute to these shortfalls. We assessed the association between cardiologist ambulatory workload and guideline‐directed medical therapy prescription for patients with heart failure with reduced EF. Methods This was a cross‐sectional study of patients with heart failure with reduced EF (EF ≤40%) seen by a cardiologist from October 1, 2022, to September 30, 2023, using deidentified administrative and electronic health record data from Optum Labs Data Warehouse, which includes data from multiple health systems across the United States. The primary exposure was ambulatory workload, measured as the average number of visits per day, categorized into quartiles. The primary outcome was “comprehensive quadruple therapy,” defined as prescription for all 4 guideline‐directed medical therapies: β‐blocker; angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; and sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor. Analyses were conducted using generalized estimating equations, adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. Results Overall, 40 173 patients were seen by 881 cardiologists (median ambulatory workload, 9.1 patients per day; interquartile range=5.1–13.0). The percentage of patients prescribed comprehensive quadruple therapy was higher among patients in lower quartiles (quartile 1: 14%; quartile 2: 9.7%; quartile 3: 8.9%; quartile 4: 7.4%; P <0.001). In adjusted analysis, there was a graded association between lower workload quartile and higher odds of comprehensive quadruple therapy, compared with the highest quartile (odds ratio [95% CI], P value=quartile 1: 1.35 [1.09–1.66], 0.008; quartile 2: 1.20 [1.00–1.43], 0.050; quartile 3: 1.11 [0.93–1.32], 0.28; quartile 4 [reference]). Conclusions Seeing a cardiologist with lower ambulatory workload was associated with increased prescribing of guideline‐recommended, life‐saving therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced EF. Current models that incentivize more visits per day may negatively impact care in the ambulatory setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.048608
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association Between Cardiologist Ambulatory Workload and Evidence‐Based Therapy for Heart Failure

Anne‐Laure Faucon, Alex R. Chang, Morgan Erika Grams, Donglan “Stacy” Zhang et al.
1 citations
Journal of the American Heart Association
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
4.96
article

Association Between Cardiologist Ambulatory Workload and Evidence‐Based Therapy for Heart Failure

Anne‐Laure Faucon, Alex R. Chang, Morgan Erika Grams, Donglan “Stacy” Zhang, Jung‐Im Shin, Karan R. Chhabra, Matthew F. Blum, Juan Jesús Carrero, Amrita Mukhopadhyay, Lesley A. Inker, Yingying Sang, Saul Blecker, Leora Idit Horwitz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Most eligible patients are not prescribed guideline‐directed medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF). Increased time pressures for providers in the ambulatory setting may contribute to these shortfalls. We assessed the association between cardiologist ambulatory workload and guideline‐directed medical therapy prescription for patients with heart failure with reduced EF. Methods This was a cross‐sectional study of patients with heart failure with reduced EF (EF ≤40%) seen by a cardiologist from October 1, 2022, to September 30, 2023, using deidentified administrative and electronic health record data from Optum Labs Data Warehouse, which includes data from multiple health systems across the United States. The primary exposure was ambulatory workload, measured as the average number of visits per day, categorized into quartiles. The primary outcome was “comprehensive quadruple therapy,” defined as prescription for all 4 guideline‐directed medical therapies: β‐blocker; angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; and sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor. Analyses were conducted using generalized estimating equations, adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. Results Overall, 40 173 patients were seen by 881 cardiologists (median ambulatory workload, 9.1 patients per day; interquartile range=5.1–13.0). The percentage of patients prescribed comprehensive quadruple therapy was higher among patients in lower quartiles (quartile 1: 14%; quartile 2: 9.7%; quartile 3: 8.9%; quartile 4: 7.4%; P <0.001). In adjusted analysis, there was a graded association between lower workload quartile and higher odds of comprehensive quadruple therapy, compared with the highest quartile (odds ratio [95% CI], P value=quartile 1: 1.35 [1.09–1.66], 0.008; quartile 2: 1.20 [1.00–1.43], 0.050; quartile 3: 1.11 [0.93–1.32], 0.28; quartile 4 [reference]). Conclusions Seeing a cardiologist with lower ambulatory workload was associated with increased prescribing of guideline‐recommended, life‐saving therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced EF. Current models that incentivize more visits per day may negatively impact care in the ambulatory setting.

Journal of the American Heart Association
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (US), Tufts Medical Center (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Danderyds sjukhus (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Bellevue Hospital Center (US), Optimal Solutions (United States) (US), NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine (US), Geisinger Health System (US), New York University (US)
American Heart Association, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Tufts Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University, Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance, Karolinska Institutet, National Institutes of Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon