Ethical risks of artificial intelligence-based decision support systems in organizations

This article analyzes the ethical risks arising from the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision support systems in organizations. While these systems improve the speed and validity of decisions by processing large amounts of data, they also raise issues of algorithmic bias, opacity, erosion of responsibility, and privacy protection. Based on a literature review and an analysis of real-world AI case studies, four groups of issues that create ethical risks are identified: bias and fairness issues, transparency and explainability issues, accountability and responsibility in decision-making, and privacy and privacy issues. It is shown that mitigating these risks requires not only compliance with regulatory requirements but also organizational measures (ethical system design, algorithmic audit, the creation of AI ethics committees, and continuous monitoring of models after deployment). The combination of fairness, explainability, and accountability allows organizations to leverage the benefits of AI in decision-making without deviating from ethical standards. The scientific novelty of this study lies in its systematization of the ethical risks of AI-based decision support systems as applied to organizations. The practical significance of this study lies in the potential use of the proposed strategies for the ethical implementation of AI in the design and implementation of decision support systems in organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
National Security and Strategic Planning
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37468/2307-1400-2026-2-5-17
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical risks of artificial intelligence-based decision support systems in organizations

Alexandr Matveev
2 links
National Security and Strategic Planning
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Ethical risks of artificial intelligence-based decision support systems in organizations

Alexandr Matveev
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the ethical risks arising from the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision support systems in organizations. While these systems improve the speed and validity of decisions by processing large amounts of data, they also raise issues of algorithmic bias, opacity, erosion of responsibility, and privacy protection. Based on a literature review and an analysis of real-world AI case studies, four groups of issues that create ethical risks are identified: bias and fairness issues, transparency and explainability issues, accountability and responsibility in decision-making, and privacy and privacy issues. It is shown that mitigating these risks requires not only compliance with regulatory requirements but also organizational measures (ethical system design, algorithmic audit, the creation of AI ethics committees, and continuous monitoring of models after deployment). The combination of fairness, explainability, and accountability allows organizations to leverage the benefits of AI in decision-making without deviating from ethical standards. The scientific novelty of this study lies in its systematization of the ethical risks of AI-based decision support systems as applied to organizations. The practical significance of this study lies in the potential use of the proposed strategies for the ethical implementation of AI in the design and implementation of decision support systems in organizations.

National Security and Strategic Planning(2)
Academy of the State Fire Service EMERCOM of Russia (RU)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon