A qualitative framing analysis of the role of parents and families in English obesity policy documents 2010–2020

Abstract Background Childhood obesity is a key policy challenge facing governments globally. Three decades of policy initiatives in England have been largely unsuccessful in reducing prevalence and inequalities in childhood obesity. Parents and families are often portrayed as responsible for children’s weight in the media. Less is known about their portrayal in policy documents. Understanding how parents and families are framed in policy documents can provide important insights into the factors shaping policy decisions and could thus support the development of more effective policies. This study extends prior work by shifting attention from media and intervention framing to the representation of parents and families within national policy texts. Methods A qualitative framing analysis was conducted on how parents and families are framed in six seminal English childhood obesity policy documents published 2010–2020. Reflexive thematic analysis and framing theory were applied to identify themes. Results Four themes were identified: (1) Parents and families are decision-makers; (2) Public services should empower parents and families; (3) Assumption of maternal responsibility for the family; and (4) Individual responsibility via the family. There were notable omissions in policies related to parents and childhood obesity, particularly broader societal factors such as financial constraints, contemporary family constellations and food insecurity. Conclusions This research emphasizes the importance of both language and framing, and their potential biases in influencing policy approaches concerning parents’ role in childhood obesity. There is a need for re-evaluating commonly used frames that put excessive responsibility on parents to provide a healthy lifestyle for their children. Changes in framing in future policy are necessary to provide adequate support for parents and families for their effective involvement in addressing childhood obesity. Future policy should move beyond parent-blaming frames by combining recognition of family agency with practical, equitable support that addresses material, service and environmental constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-30098-1
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A qualitative framing analysis of the role of parents and families in English obesity policy documents 2010–2020

Andrea Dominica Smith, Benjamin R. Hawkins, Lucy A. Fell
BMC Public Health
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
article

A qualitative framing analysis of the role of parents and families in English obesity policy documents 2010–2020

Andrea Dominica Smith, Benjamin R. Hawkins, Lucy A. Fell
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Childhood obesity is a key policy challenge facing governments globally. Three decades of policy initiatives in England have been largely unsuccessful in reducing prevalence and inequalities in childhood obesity. Parents and families are often portrayed as responsible for children’s weight in the media. Less is known about their portrayal in policy documents. Understanding how parents and families are framed in policy documents can provide important insights into the factors shaping policy decisions and could thus support the development of more effective policies. This study extends prior work by shifting attention from media and intervention framing to the representation of parents and families within national policy texts. Methods A qualitative framing analysis was conducted on how parents and families are framed in six seminal English childhood obesity policy documents published 2010–2020. Reflexive thematic analysis and framing theory were applied to identify themes. Results Four themes were identified: (1) Parents and families are decision-makers; (2) Public services should empower parents and families; (3) Assumption of maternal responsibility for the family; and (4) Individual responsibility via the family. There were notable omissions in policies related to parents and childhood obesity, particularly broader societal factors such as financial constraints, contemporary family constellations and food insecurity. Conclusions This research emphasizes the importance of both language and framing, and their potential biases in influencing policy approaches concerning parents’ role in childhood obesity. There is a need for re-evaluating commonly used frames that put excessive responsibility on parents to provide a healthy lifestyle for their children. Changes in framing in future policy are necessary to provide adequate support for parents and families for their effective involvement in addressing childhood obesity. Future policy should move beyond parent-blaming frames by combining recognition of family agency with practical, equitable support that addresses material, service and environmental constraints.

BMC Public Health
University of Cambridge (GB), MRC Epidemiology Unit (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon