Negative-Entropy Construction Theory II

This paper develops a geometric and dynamical extension of the logical-domain framework established in Negative-Entropy Construction Theory I. Rather than assuming that a logical domain necessarily possesses a manifold structure or an intrinsic dynamics, we introduce the additional structures required to construct such realizations. We begin with an environment configuration space and define the feasible state set through the relations and constraints of a logical domain. We then introduce admissible transition relations, local admissible variations, and the distinction between geometric degrees of freedom and dynamically permitted degrees of freedom. Under appropriate regularity conditions, the feasible state set admits a manifold realization, while its tangent spaces describe geometrically admissible directions. We further examine the influence of global topology on vector-field existence and dynamical behavior, including the Poincaré–Hopf theorem, the Poincaré–Bendixson theorem, and the distinction between low-dimensional and higher-dimensional autonomous dynamics. Smooth, nonsmooth, and hybrid dynamical systems are considered as different realization mechanisms for admissible evolution. Finally, we define dynamical classification through invariant sets, attractors, basins of attraction, and asymptotic behavior. We establish sufficient conditions under which finitely many basins of attraction form a complete partition of the feasible state space, while explicitly allowing for unclassified regions in the general case. The resulting framework provides a structured passage from logical-domain constraints to feasible configurations, local freedom, geometric realization, and dynamical classification. It does not claim that every logical domain necessarily generates a manifold or a dynamical system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23824795
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Dynamics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Negative-Entropy Construction Theory II

GUANHUA YU
5 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complex Systems and Dynamics
preprint

Negative-Entropy Construction Theory II

GUANHUA YU
preprint en

Abstract

This paper develops a geometric and dynamical extension of the logical-domain framework established in Negative-Entropy Construction Theory I. Rather than assuming that a logical domain necessarily possesses a manifold structure or an intrinsic dynamics, we introduce the additional structures required to construct such realizations. We begin with an environment configuration space and define the feasible state set through the relations and constraints of a logical domain. We then introduce admissible transition relations, local admissible variations, and the distinction between geometric degrees of freedom and dynamically permitted degrees of freedom. Under appropriate regularity conditions, the feasible state set admits a manifold realization, while its tangent spaces describe geometrically admissible directions. We further examine the influence of global topology on vector-field existence and dynamical behavior, including the Poincaré–Hopf theorem, the Poincaré–Bendixson theorem, and the distinction between low-dimensional and higher-dimensional autonomous dynamics. Smooth, nonsmooth, and hybrid dynamical systems are considered as different realization mechanisms for admissible evolution. Finally, we define dynamical classification through invariant sets, attractors, basins of attraction, and asymptotic behavior. We establish sufficient conditions under which finitely many basins of attraction form a complete partition of the feasible state space, while explicitly allowing for unclassified regions in the general case. The resulting framework provides a structured passage from logical-domain constraints to feasible configurations, local freedom, geometric realization, and dynamical classification. It does not claim that every logical domain necessarily generates a manifold or a dynamical system.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complex Systems and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon