Margin Buying Intensity and Future Stock Returns: Evidence from China’s A-share Market

This study examines whether margin buying contains information about subsequent stock returns in China’s A-share market. Using a monthly data set from January 2022 through June 2026, we measure margin buying intensity as monthly margin purchases divided by monthly trading value. Because the 12–2 momentum control requires pre-sample return history, including signals from early 2022 would require monthly returns from 2021. Since the final return series begins in January 2022, the fully controlled baseline specification starts in January 2023. Firm- and month-fixed-effects estimates show that a one-standard-deviation increase in margin buying intensity predicts 0.49, 0.83, and 0.96 percentage points higher cumulative returns over the next one, three, and six months, respectively. Fama–MacBeth regressions with Newey–West corrections remain significantly positive at all three horizons, and quintile sorts produce equal-weighted high-minus-low spreads of 0.97%, 1.88%, and 3.66%. The findings survive winsorization of future returns, a no-look-ahead book-to-market control, alternative financing measures, alternative momentum controls, exclusions of the September–October 2024 market episode, and screens for financial firms and ST-designated stock-months. Additional checks show that the short- and medium-horizon relation survives stringent industry-time controls and alternative normalizations of financing demand, although the six-month estimate is more sensitive under these specifications. Fully interacted tests indicate a substantial positive shift in predictive strength from 2024 onward. A symmetric comparison shows that short-selling intensity predicts lower future returns in the pooled sample. Overall, leveraged long and short trading contain directionally different predictive information, while the strength of the margin-buying signal varies materially over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economics and Management Sciences
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30560/jems.v9n5p151
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Margin Buying Intensity and Future Stock Returns: Evidence from China’s A-share Market

Ang Wu, Yujie Xiong, Yuan Cui
1 links
Journal of Economics and Management Sciences
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Margin Buying Intensity and Future Stock Returns: Evidence from China’s A-share Market

Ang Wu, Yujie Xiong, Yuan Cui
article en

Abstract

This study examines whether margin buying contains information about subsequent stock returns in China’s A-share market. Using a monthly data set from January 2022 through June 2026, we measure margin buying intensity as monthly margin purchases divided by monthly trading value. Because the 12–2 momentum control requires pre-sample return history, including signals from early 2022 would require monthly returns from 2021. Since the final return series begins in January 2022, the fully controlled baseline specification starts in January 2023. Firm- and month-fixed-effects estimates show that a one-standard-deviation increase in margin buying intensity predicts 0.49, 0.83, and 0.96 percentage points higher cumulative returns over the next one, three, and six months, respectively. Fama–MacBeth regressions with Newey–West corrections remain significantly positive at all three horizons, and quintile sorts produce equal-weighted high-minus-low spreads of 0.97%, 1.88%, and 3.66%. The findings survive winsorization of future returns, a no-look-ahead book-to-market control, alternative financing measures, alternative momentum controls, exclusions of the September–October 2024 market episode, and screens for financial firms and ST-designated stock-months. Additional checks show that the short- and medium-horizon relation survives stringent industry-time controls and alternative normalizations of financing demand, although the six-month estimate is more sensitive under these specifications. Fully interacted tests indicate a substantial positive shift in predictive strength from 2024 onward. A symmetric comparison shows that short-selling intensity predicts lower future returns in the pooled sample. Overall, leveraged long and short trading contain directionally different predictive information, while the strength of the margin-buying signal varies materially over time.

Journal of Economics and Management SciencesVol. 9(5)
City University of Macau (MO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon