Surveillance Readiness Audit: Completeness of Surveillance-Critical Metadata in U.S. Clinical Pathogen Genomes, 2015 to 2026

A pathogen genome supports early outbreak detection only when it is deposited with basic context: when and where the sample was collected, its source and host, whether it came from a patient, and, for resistance surveillance, its antimicrobial susceptibility. NCBI Pathogen Detection integrates the national public record of bacterial and fungal pathogen genomes, but the completeness of this context has not been measured routinely across organisms. This paper describes the Surveillance Readiness Audit v1.0.0, an open, reproducible audit of six surveillance-critical metadata fields (collection date precision, state geography, isolation source, host, epi type and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) availability) for every U.S. isolate in 107 organism groups, stratified by organism, year added and submitter type. The v1.0.0 build, from NCBI data retrieved on 14 October 2026, covers 1,239,575 U.S. isolates added from 2015 to 2026, of which 911,265 (73.5%) are clinical. Only 13.4% of clinical isolates record a state, compared with 84.8% of environmental isolates, and only 6.1% carry all five core fields; 0.8% carry AST results. Year-only collection dates rose from 17.0% of clinical isolates added in 2022 to 69.2% of those added in 2024. Submissions owned by federal agencies account for 83.8% of clinical isolates, and 2.7% of them record a state. The gaps that most limit early detection from the public record are therefore geography and date precision in a small number of high-volume network programs, and susceptibility data everywhere.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preprints.org
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202610.3005.v1
Primary Topic
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Surveillance Readiness Audit: Completeness of Surveillance-Critical Metadata in U.S. Clinical Pathogen Genomes, 2015 to 2026

Emmanuel Akhigbe Igbuan
Preprints.org
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
preprint

Surveillance Readiness Audit: Completeness of Surveillance-Critical Metadata in U.S. Clinical Pathogen Genomes, 2015 to 2026

Emmanuel Akhigbe Igbuan
preprint en

Abstract

A pathogen genome supports early outbreak detection only when it is deposited with basic context: when and where the sample was collected, its source and host, whether it came from a patient, and, for resistance surveillance, its antimicrobial susceptibility. NCBI Pathogen Detection integrates the national public record of bacterial and fungal pathogen genomes, but the completeness of this context has not been measured routinely across organisms. This paper describes the Surveillance Readiness Audit v1.0.0, an open, reproducible audit of six surveillance-critical metadata fields (collection date precision, state geography, isolation source, host, epi type and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) availability) for every U.S. isolate in 107 organism groups, stratified by organism, year added and submitter type. The v1.0.0 build, from NCBI data retrieved on 14 October 2026, covers 1,239,575 U.S. isolates added from 2015 to 2026, of which 911,265 (73.5%) are clinical. Only 13.4% of clinical isolates record a state, compared with 84.8% of environmental isolates, and only 6.1% carry all five core fields; 0.8% carry AST results. Year-only collection dates rose from 17.0% of clinical isolates added in 2022 to 69.2% of those added in 2024. Submissions owned by federal agencies account for 83.8% of clinical isolates, and 2.7% of them record a state. The gaps that most limit early detection from the public record are therefore geography and date precision in a small number of high-volume network programs, and susceptibility data everywhere.

Preprints.org
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon