COVID-19 lockdown duration and transitions in family intergenerational support patterns: Evidence from the China Family Panel Studies

Abstract The family is the primary informal insurance mechanism through which economies buffer individual and aggregate risks, yet whether a major crisis activates intergenerational mutual aid or, instead, weakens intergenerational ties through physical isolation and resource strain remains unclear. Existing studies mostly examine changes in a single support dimension in isolation, or the simple before-versus-after correlation, and often rely on small, short-run samples, leaving the overall effect of the shock on the configuration of intergenerational support poorly understood. Using four waves (2016–2022) of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), we first classify intergenerational support into four cross-wave comparable patterns—Reciprocal, Filial-support, Interactive, and Detached—through latent class analysis, and then apply a multi-group difference-in-differences design to identify the causal effect of lockdown intensity on transitions between support patterns, its dynamic path, and its heterogeneity by household resources. We find that prolonged lockdowns shift households away from one-way support or detachment toward two-way reciprocity: the effect increases in lockdown intensity, is concentrated in the most strictly locked-down regions, and raises the post-pandemic probability of being Reciprocal by about 4.8 and 5.1 percentage points on average. The effect is delayed, being close to zero in the shock year (2020) and significant only by 2022. The shift toward reciprocity is widespread across income groups, whereas transitions into Filial-support are highly concentrated among low-income households. Overall, a major public-health shock triggers an adaptive reconfiguration of intergenerational support patterns, but its direction, lag, and form depend on shock intensity and household resources; the family, as an informal safety net, is resource-asymmetric, all the more so for vulnerable households. JEL Classification: J12; D19; I18; J14

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11035954/v1
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

COVID-19 lockdown duration and transitions in family intergenerational support patterns: Evidence from the China Family Panel Studies

Jun He
3 links
Research Square
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
preprint

COVID-19 lockdown duration and transitions in family intergenerational support patterns: Evidence from the China Family Panel Studies

Jun He
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract The family is the primary informal insurance mechanism through which economies buffer individual and aggregate risks, yet whether a major crisis activates intergenerational mutual aid or, instead, weakens intergenerational ties through physical isolation and resource strain remains unclear. Existing studies mostly examine changes in a single support dimension in isolation, or the simple before-versus-after correlation, and often rely on small, short-run samples, leaving the overall effect of the shock on the configuration of intergenerational support poorly understood. Using four waves (2016–2022) of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), we first classify intergenerational support into four cross-wave comparable patterns—Reciprocal, Filial-support, Interactive, and Detached—through latent class analysis, and then apply a multi-group difference-in-differences design to identify the causal effect of lockdown intensity on transitions between support patterns, its dynamic path, and its heterogeneity by household resources. We find that prolonged lockdowns shift households away from one-way support or detachment toward two-way reciprocity: the effect increases in lockdown intensity, is concentrated in the most strictly locked-down regions, and raises the post-pandemic probability of being Reciprocal by about 4.8 and 5.1 percentage points on average. The effect is delayed, being close to zero in the shock year (2020) and significant only by 2022. The shift toward reciprocity is widespread across income groups, whereas transitions into Filial-support are highly concentrated among low-income households. Overall, a major public-health shock triggers an adaptive reconfiguration of intergenerational support patterns, but its direction, lag, and form depend on shock intensity and household resources; the family, as an informal safety net, is resource-asymmetric, all the more so for vulnerable households. JEL Classification: J12; D19; I18; J14

Research Square
Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon