Reaction precedents extend retrosynthetic prediction beyond training coverage

Reaction precedents guide retrosynthesis, but how far they can compensate for gaps in task-specific training coverage remains unclear. Using 2.71 million reactions, we restricted training and retrieval coverage by transformation or time, then expanded only the retrieval corpus with model parameters fixed. For transformations excluded from training, mean Top-1 accuracy increased from 13.0% to 58.0% on a historical test set and from 4.9% to 23.1% on a temporally held-out test set. For temporal coverage gaps, retrieval expansion enabled a model trained on records before 2017 to match or exceed a non-retrieval model trained on records before 2025 on both test sets. Without task-specific fine-tuning, precedents improved all 14 representative general-purpose models on both test sets and USPTO-50K; the strongest with precedents surpassed all eight representative specialized models. These findings show that inference-time reaction precedents can extend retrosynthetic prediction beyond task-specific training coverage without parameter updates.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.40249
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Reaction precedents extend retrosynthetic prediction beyond training coverage

Lingli Ge, Ruiyi Ding, Yinfan Wang, Changyu HSIEH et al.
arXiv (Cornell University)
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
preprint

Reaction precedents extend retrosynthetic prediction beyond training coverage

Lingli Ge, Ruiyi Ding, Yinfan Wang, Changyu HSIEH, Xuli Shen, Jiaxing Sun, Xiao An, Bowen Zhou, Xiaojian Wang, Yuqiang Li, Jiang Wu, Yubin Wang, Dahua Lin, Xi Xue, Yu Liu, Xingjian Wei, Ruikang Zhang, Lijun Wu, Xibao Li, Conghui He
preprint en

Abstract

Reaction precedents guide retrosynthesis, but how far they can compensate for gaps in task-specific training coverage remains unclear. Using 2.71 million reactions, we restricted training and retrieval coverage by transformation or time, then expanded only the retrieval corpus with model parameters fixed. For transformations excluded from training, mean Top-1 accuracy increased from 13.0% to 58.0% on a historical test set and from 4.9% to 23.1% on a temporally held-out test set. For temporal coverage gaps, retrieval expansion enabled a model trained on records before 2017 to match or exceed a non-retrieval model trained on records before 2025 on both test sets. Without task-specific fine-tuning, precedents improved all 14 representative general-purpose models on both test sets and USPTO-50K; the strongest with precedents surpassed all eight representative specialized models. These findings show that inference-time reaction precedents can extend retrosynthetic prediction beyond task-specific training coverage without parameter updates.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Reaction precedents extend retrosynthetic prediction beyond training coverage — Lingli Ge, Ruiyi Ding, et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS