Predictions in a Noisy Environment: The Influence of Automation Reliability and Transparency on User Trust

This study examined the potential interaction between automation reliability and automation transparency in the context of a weather-related decision to close a school in the face of a forecast blizzard. Participants received snowfall and closure advice from four different weather services dependent upon an automation weather model that differed in its degree of reliability (100% vs. 67%). Two of the services simply provided advice, and for two of them, this advice was accompanied by transparency in the form of the raw data, or weather symptoms display that was input into the weather model. The results revealed that degraded reliability of the automation lowered trust in and dependence on the advice and hurt overall accuracy. In a significant interaction, these degraded effects were mitigated by automation transparency. These findings were interpreted in terms of a mechanism of optimal attention allocated (weighting) between the raw data transparency and the weather service advice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261498745
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictions in a Noisy Environment: The Influence of Automation Reliability and Transparency on User Trust

Jessica K. Witt, Christopher D. Wickens, Haley Lexis Short
2 links
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Predictions in a Noisy Environment: The Influence of Automation Reliability and Transparency on User Trust

Jessica K. Witt, Christopher D. Wickens, Haley Lexis Short
article en

Abstract

This study examined the potential interaction between automation reliability and automation transparency in the context of a weather-related decision to close a school in the face of a forecast blizzard. Participants received snowfall and closure advice from four different weather services dependent upon an automation weather model that differed in its degree of reliability (100% vs. 67%). Two of the services simply provided advice, and for two of them, this advice was accompanied by transparency in the form of the raw data, or weather symptoms display that was input into the weather model. The results revealed that degraded reliability of the automation lowered trust in and dependence on the advice and hurt overall accuracy. In a significant interaction, these degraded effects were mitigated by automation transparency. These findings were interpreted in terms of a mechanism of optimal attention allocated (weighting) between the raw data transparency and the weather service advice.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon