State dependence of aerosol forcing and its implications for climate response

Abstract. Aerosols offset greenhouse-gas warming, but their radiative forcing is often treated as a property of the aerosol perturbation, without accounting for the climate state in which it occurs. Here we show that this assumption is incomplete using atmosphere-only simulations with two GFDL atmospheric model configurations, GFDL-AM4.0 and GFDL-AM4-MG2, across climates from 8 K colder to 8 K warmer than present day. In both models, the same present-day-minus-preindustrial aerosol-emission perturbation produces weaker cooling as climate warms. This weakening arises from changes in both aerosol–radiation and aerosol–cloud interactions. Direct aerosol forcing weakens as aerosol optical depth decreases, reflecting changes in aerosol burden and the optical effectiveness of aerosol mass. Aerosol–cloud forcing weakens through model-dependent mechanisms: shortwave liquid-cloud adjustments dominate in GFDL-AM4.0, consistent with reduced cloud susceptibility in warmer climates, whereas GFDL-AM4-MG2 shows an additional longwave pathway involving aerosol–cloud–ice interactions and high-cloud responses. Aerosol forcing also weakens as climate feedbacks become less negative, revealing consistent within-model co-variation of forcing and feedback. These results highlight the importance of accounting for background climate state when interpreting the role of aerosol forcing in historical attribution, climate model tuning, and future climate projections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6648
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

State dependence of aerosol forcing and its implications for climate response

Ryan J. Kramer, Jianhao Zhang, Brian J. Soden, Chanyoung Park et al.
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
preprint

State dependence of aerosol forcing and its implications for climate response

Ryan J. Kramer, Jianhao Zhang, Brian J. Soden, Chanyoung Park, Haozhe He, Gabriel A. Vecchi
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract. Aerosols offset greenhouse-gas warming, but their radiative forcing is often treated as a property of the aerosol perturbation, without accounting for the climate state in which it occurs. Here we show that this assumption is incomplete using atmosphere-only simulations with two GFDL atmospheric model configurations, GFDL-AM4.0 and GFDL-AM4-MG2, across climates from 8 K colder to 8 K warmer than present day. In both models, the same present-day-minus-preindustrial aerosol-emission perturbation produces weaker cooling as climate warms. This weakening arises from changes in both aerosol–radiation and aerosol–cloud interactions. Direct aerosol forcing weakens as aerosol optical depth decreases, reflecting changes in aerosol burden and the optical effectiveness of aerosol mass. Aerosol–cloud forcing weakens through model-dependent mechanisms: shortwave liquid-cloud adjustments dominate in GFDL-AM4.0, consistent with reduced cloud susceptibility in warmer climates, whereas GFDL-AM4-MG2 shows an additional longwave pathway involving aerosol–cloud–ice interactions and high-cloud responses. Aerosol forcing also weakens as climate feedbacks become less negative, revealing consistent within-model co-variation of forcing and feedback. These results highlight the importance of accounting for background climate state when interpreting the role of aerosol forcing in historical attribution, climate model tuning, and future climate projections.

University of Miami (US), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (US), Princeton University (US), NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory (US), High Meadows Environmental Institute (US), University of Virginia (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Simons Foundation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Climate Program Office
Climate action
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon