Why three? A cone-geometry derivation of the integrable swinging Atwood's machine

Abstract The swinging Atwood's machine can be used in classical mechanics courses to study chaotic and integrable dynamics. The standard demonstration of integrability proceeds by a canonical transformation at μ = M/m = 3; however, it arrives without motivation. This paper replaces the ansatz with a derivation. Writing the kinetic energy as a Riemannian metric on configuration space identifies the pulley as a cone point of total angle 2π/√(μ+1). At μ = 3 the angle is π, the cone admits a smooth double branched cover, and on the cover the Hamilton–Jacobi equation separates in parabolic coordinates. The cone condition is necessary but not sufficient: the kinetic and potential terms are shown to require μ = 3 independently. The treatment is self-contained, assumes no prior differential geometry, and is intended for advanced undergraduate and beginning graduate courses; nine problems, sorted by classroom setting, are supplied.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Physics
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aebc26
Primary Topic
Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why three? A cone-geometry derivation of the integrable swinging Atwood's machine

Nicholas Tufillaro
European Journal of Physics
Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
article

Why three? A cone-geometry derivation of the integrable swinging Atwood's machine

Nicholas Tufillaro
article en

Abstract

Abstract The swinging Atwood's machine can be used in classical mechanics courses to study chaotic and integrable dynamics. The standard demonstration of integrability proceeds by a canonical transformation at μ = M/m = 3; however, it arrives without motivation. This paper replaces the ansatz with a derivation. Writing the kinetic energy as a Riemannian metric on configuration space identifies the pulley as a cone point of total angle 2π/√(μ+1). At μ = 3 the angle is π, the cone admits a smooth double branched cover, and on the cover the Hamilton–Jacobi equation separates in parabolic coordinates. The cone condition is necessary but not sufficient: the kinetic and potential terms are shown to require μ = 3 independently. The treatment is self-contained, assumes no prior differential geometry, and is intended for advanced undergraduate and beginning graduate courses; nine problems, sorted by classroom setting, are supplied.

European Journal of Physics
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon