From Harness Optimization to Recursive Self-Improvement: A Survey of Language Model Agents

Language-model agents rely on harnesses that govern tool use, context, memory, and execution. Understanding automated harness revision requires connecting improvement methods to the reusable functionality they produce. This survey examines three linked perspectives: improvement workflows, recursive scope, and concrete modifications across task domains. We compare search strategies, memory management, edit guidance, and integration with model training, and use an existing five-level framework to distinguish harness optimization from recursive self-improvement. Across coding, reasoning and information processing, interactive and embodied tasks, and visual tasks, we trace reported changes from starting capabilities to outcomes. Our synthesis identifies repairs at model–environment interfaces, cases where added tools and context fail to help, and conditions constraining recovery reuse. Cross-domain analogies motivate, rather than establish, transfer. We distinguish task-performance gains from improved subsequent optimization and identify priorities in reliable evaluation, attribution, transfer, and safety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preprints.org
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202610.2293.v2
Primary Topic
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

From Harness Optimization to Recursive Self-Improvement: A Survey of Language Model Agents

Wenxin Long, Lingzhou Xue, Xin Yu, Chengyuan Liu et al.
Preprints.org
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
preprint

From Harness Optimization to Recursive Self-Improvement: A Survey of Language Model Agents

Wenxin Long, Lingzhou Xue, Xin Yu, Chengyuan Liu, Haochen Zhang
preprint en

Abstract

Language-model agents rely on harnesses that govern tool use, context, memory, and execution. Understanding automated harness revision requires connecting improvement methods to the reusable functionality they produce. This survey examines three linked perspectives: improvement workflows, recursive scope, and concrete modifications across task domains. We compare search strategies, memory management, edit guidance, and integration with model training, and use an existing five-level framework to distinguish harness optimization from recursive self-improvement. Across coding, reasoning and information processing, interactive and embodied tasks, and visual tasks, we trace reported changes from starting capabilities to outcomes. Our synthesis identifies repairs at model–environment interfaces, cases where added tools and context fail to help, and conditions constraining recovery reuse. Cross-domain analogies motivate, rather than establish, transfer. We distinguish task-performance gains from improved subsequent optimization and identify priorities in reliable evaluation, attribution, transfer, and safety.

Preprints.org
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon