Ethical and Policy Considerations for Medically Assisted Treatment (MAT) in the Carceral Environment

Abstract: Medication-assisted treatment (MAT), a combination of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and counseling, is the evidence-based standard of care for opioid use disorder (OUD). Yet MOUD remains underused in U.S. jails and prisons despite elevated post-release overdose risk. This essay examines the ethical and policy implications of the MOUD component in correctional settings through the four core principles of medical ethics: autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice. It argues that denying or restricting MOUD undermines informed consent, causes preventable harm through forced withdrawal and treatment interruption, fails to promote individual and public health, and perpetuates inequitable access to care for already marginalized populations. The essay concludes by advancing policy recommendations to establish nationwide correctional MOUD standards, ensure community-level parity of care, protect patient autonomy, promote continuity of treatment, and strengthen oversight to meet ethical, constitutional, and public health obligations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2026.a1005874
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical and Policy Considerations for Medically Assisted Treatment (MAT) in the Carceral Environment

Gregory J. Dober
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

Ethical and Policy Considerations for Medically Assisted Treatment (MAT) in the Carceral Environment

Gregory J. Dober
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Medication-assisted treatment (MAT), a combination of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and counseling, is the evidence-based standard of care for opioid use disorder (OUD). Yet MOUD remains underused in U.S. jails and prisons despite elevated post-release overdose risk. This essay examines the ethical and policy implications of the MOUD component in correctional settings through the four core principles of medical ethics: autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice. It argues that denying or restricting MOUD undermines informed consent, causes preventable harm through forced withdrawal and treatment interruption, fails to promote individual and public health, and perpetuates inequitable access to care for already marginalized populations. The essay concludes by advancing policy recommendations to establish nationwide correctional MOUD standards, ensure community-level parity of care, protect patient autonomy, promote continuity of treatment, and strengthen oversight to meet ethical, constitutional, and public health obligations.

Journal of Health Care for the Poor and UnderservedVol. 37(4)
Good health and well-being, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Ethical and Policy Considerations for Medically Assisted Treatment (MAT) in the Carceral Environment — Gregory J. Dober · Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS