Effects of Ice Hockey Stick Shaft Flex on Shooting Velocity and Snap-Shot Accuracy in Junior Ice Hockey Players: A Counterbalanced Crossover Study

Background/Objectives: Shaft stiffness (“flex”) is the only routinely individualised ice hockey stick specification, yet evidence on its effect on shooting is inconsistent; this is because previous studies have used fixed stiffness levels for players of different sizes and strengths. We determined the effect of deviating, in either direction, from the player’s habitual flex, congruent with the body mass reference flex, on on-ice shooting velocity and snap-shot accuracy in junior players. Methods: Thirty male junior players (18–19 years) whose habitual effective flex was within ±10 units of the body mass reference flex completed a complete counterbalanced (Williams-type) crossover with three sticks differing only in nominal shaft flex—the habitual flex (FLEX0), a shaft 15 units more compliant (FLEX−15), and one 15 units stiffer (FLEX+15)—each preceded by three familiarisation sessions. Wrist- and snap-shot velocity (radar) and snap-shot accuracy in an externally paced target task were analysed with linear mixed models. Results: Flex affected wrist-shot velocity (ηp2 = 0.35), snap-shot velocity (ηp2 = 0.68) and snap-shot accuracy (ηp2 = 0.34), with all three outcomes highest at FLEX0. The wrist shot lost 2.9% with both deviations, whereas the snap shot lost 5.6% with the compliant shaft, but only 1.6% with the stiff shaft (Flex × Technique ηp2 = 0.29). Snap-shot accuracy fell by 9.1 and 14.4 percentage points. Conclusions: In players fitted within ±10 units of the body mass reference flex, deviations of ±15 flex units from the habitual flex were associated with lower shooting velocity and snap-shot accuracy; for the snap shot, an over-compliant shaft was the costlier deviation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomechanics
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics6040099
Primary Topic
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Ice Hockey Stick Shaft Flex on Shooting Velocity and Snap-Shot Accuracy in Junior Ice Hockey Players: A Counterbalanced Crossover Study

Artur Terbalyan, Robert Roczniok, Hanna Zielonka, Piotr Wiśniewski et al.
Biomechanics
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
article

Effects of Ice Hockey Stick Shaft Flex on Shooting Velocity and Snap-Shot Accuracy in Junior Ice Hockey Players: A Counterbalanced Crossover Study

Artur Terbalyan, Robert Roczniok, Hanna Zielonka, Piotr Wiśniewski, Rafał Woźny, Szymon Desperak
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Shaft stiffness (“flex”) is the only routinely individualised ice hockey stick specification, yet evidence on its effect on shooting is inconsistent; this is because previous studies have used fixed stiffness levels for players of different sizes and strengths. We determined the effect of deviating, in either direction, from the player’s habitual flex, congruent with the body mass reference flex, on on-ice shooting velocity and snap-shot accuracy in junior players. Methods: Thirty male junior players (18–19 years) whose habitual effective flex was within ±10 units of the body mass reference flex completed a complete counterbalanced (Williams-type) crossover with three sticks differing only in nominal shaft flex—the habitual flex (FLEX0), a shaft 15 units more compliant (FLEX−15), and one 15 units stiffer (FLEX+15)—each preceded by three familiarisation sessions. Wrist- and snap-shot velocity (radar) and snap-shot accuracy in an externally paced target task were analysed with linear mixed models. Results: Flex affected wrist-shot velocity (ηp2 = 0.35), snap-shot velocity (ηp2 = 0.68) and snap-shot accuracy (ηp2 = 0.34), with all three outcomes highest at FLEX0. The wrist shot lost 2.9% with both deviations, whereas the snap shot lost 5.6% with the compliant shaft, but only 1.6% with the stiff shaft (Flex × Technique ηp2 = 0.29). Snap-shot accuracy fell by 9.1 and 14.4 percentage points. Conclusions: In players fitted within ±10 units of the body mass reference flex, deviations of ±15 flex units from the habitual flex were associated with lower shooting velocity and snap-shot accuracy; for the snap shot, an over-compliant shaft was the costlier deviation.

BiomechanicsVol. 6(4)
Silesian University of Technology (PL), Medical University of Silesia (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon