A droplet-to-data workflow for antimicrobial screening of complex matrices

Screening plant extracts and other complex natural matrices for antibacterial activity is complicated by optical interference and population averaging in conventional bulk assays. Droplet-based assays mitigate interference while enabling high-throughput assessment of bacterial subpopulations. However, analyzing the resulting image data involves difficult image processing, classification, and interpretation. Here, we present a democratized workflow for antimicrobial screening in complex matrices that combines a polydisperse droplet-based assay with EasyFlow 2.0 (EF2), our updated droplet image analysis platform. EF2 offers stable containerized deployment, expanded polydisperse droplet support, automated thresholding and MIC estimation, LLM-assisted data exploration, and import of other software outputs such as CellProfiler (CP) measurements and CellProfiler Analyst (CPA) classification models. As proof of concept, we applied this workflow to assess the antibacterial and aggregation-modulating effects of chemically distinct extracts of Taraxacum officinale, Rhodiola rosea, and Lonicera caerulea against Escherichia coli. Extracts were chemically characterized by HPLC-MS and evaluated using both standard 96-well plate microdilution and droplet-based assays. In total, 27,059 droplets were segmented in CP, classified into four growth phenotypes using a CPA random forest model, and analyzed in EF2. The droplet-based assay reached minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) at lower extract concentrations than 96-well plate microdilution and revealed extract-specific aggregation effects: L. caerulea reduced E. coli aggregation, whereas T. officinale did not. R. rosea reduced growth in the 96-well plate microdilution assay, but high concentrations caused droplet gelation that prevented droplet-based analysis, showing that sample components must be checked for compatibility with droplet formation. These results illustrate that the EF2-centered workflow supports rapid, automated MIC estimation through unsupervised thresholding when labels are unavailable, and four-class aggregation phenotyping when a CPA model is supplied. This workflow offers flexible, scalable screening, potentially extendable beyond plant extracts to other complex sample matrices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.28.762405
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A droplet-to-data workflow for antimicrobial screening of complex matrices

Merike Vaher, Immanuel Sanka, Simona Bartkova, Piret Saar‐Reismaa et al.
2 links
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
preprint

A droplet-to-data workflow for antimicrobial screening of complex matrices

Merike Vaher, Immanuel Sanka, Simona Bartkova, Piret Saar‐Reismaa, R. Aditya Aryandi Setiawibawa, Pille Pata, Ott Scheler, Katri Ruuson
preprint en

Abstract

Screening plant extracts and other complex natural matrices for antibacterial activity is complicated by optical interference and population averaging in conventional bulk assays. Droplet-based assays mitigate interference while enabling high-throughput assessment of bacterial subpopulations. However, analyzing the resulting image data involves difficult image processing, classification, and interpretation. Here, we present a democratized workflow for antimicrobial screening in complex matrices that combines a polydisperse droplet-based assay with EasyFlow 2.0 (EF2), our updated droplet image analysis platform. EF2 offers stable containerized deployment, expanded polydisperse droplet support, automated thresholding and MIC estimation, LLM-assisted data exploration, and import of other software outputs such as CellProfiler (CP) measurements and CellProfiler Analyst (CPA) classification models. As proof of concept, we applied this workflow to assess the antibacterial and aggregation-modulating effects of chemically distinct extracts of Taraxacum officinale, Rhodiola rosea, and Lonicera caerulea against Escherichia coli. Extracts were chemically characterized by HPLC-MS and evaluated using both standard 96-well plate microdilution and droplet-based assays. In total, 27,059 droplets were segmented in CP, classified into four growth phenotypes using a CPA random forest model, and analyzed in EF2. The droplet-based assay reached minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) at lower extract concentrations than 96-well plate microdilution and revealed extract-specific aggregation effects: L. caerulea reduced E. coli aggregation, whereas T. officinale did not. R. rosea reduced growth in the 96-well plate microdilution assay, but high concentrations caused droplet gelation that prevented droplet-based analysis, showing that sample components must be checked for compatibility with droplet formation. These results illustrate that the EF2-centered workflow supports rapid, automated MIC estimation through unsupervised thresholding when labels are unavailable, and four-class aggregation phenotyping when a CPA model is supplied. This workflow offers flexible, scalable screening, potentially extendable beyond plant extracts to other complex sample matrices.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Tallinn University of Technology (EE)
Eesti Teadusagentuur, Tallinna Tehnikaülikool
Good health and well-being
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon