Does generative AI improve university students’ independent English language proficiency?

The growing integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into higher education raises important questions about its contribution to students’ independent learning outcomes. This study examines whether structured AI-assisted learning improves university students’ independent English language proficiency compared with unrestricted AI use and conventional instruction. A quantitative, quasi-experimental design is proposed involving 150 undergraduate and postgraduate students assigned to three instructional groups. English proficiency is assessed through pre-tests, post-tests, and delayed tests conducted without AI assistance, covering grammar, vocabulary, academic writing, reading comprehension, and speaking. Regression analysis is proposed to examine the roles of instructional approach, self-regulated learning, prior AI experience, baseline proficiency, and age in explaining proficiency gains. The study seeks to distinguish AI-supported task performance from independently demonstrated language competence and retained learning. Its anticipated contribution is to inform evidence-based integration of GenAI into university language education, emphasising structured use, learner autonomy, and independent assessment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in English
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26648717.2026.v8.i10a.938
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does generative AI improve university students’ independent English language proficiency?

Amninder Kaur
1 links
International Journal of Research in English
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Does generative AI improve university students’ independent English language proficiency?

Amninder Kaur
article en

Abstract

The growing integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into higher education raises important questions about its contribution to students’ independent learning outcomes. This study examines whether structured AI-assisted learning improves university students’ independent English language proficiency compared with unrestricted AI use and conventional instruction. A quantitative, quasi-experimental design is proposed involving 150 undergraduate and postgraduate students assigned to three instructional groups. English proficiency is assessed through pre-tests, post-tests, and delayed tests conducted without AI assistance, covering grammar, vocabulary, academic writing, reading comprehension, and speaking. Regression analysis is proposed to examine the roles of instructional approach, self-regulated learning, prior AI experience, baseline proficiency, and age in explaining proficiency gains. The study seeks to distinguish AI-supported task performance from independently demonstrated language competence and retained learning. Its anticipated contribution is to inform evidence-based integration of GenAI into university language education, emphasising structured use, learner autonomy, and independent assessment.

International Journal of Research in EnglishVol. 8(10)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Does generative AI improve university students’ independent English language proficiency? — Amninder Kaur · International Journal of Research in English (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS