Looking into the Scientist’s Mind: The Effects of Disclosing Scientists’ Rationale on Students’ Scientific Reasoning and Epistemic Beliefs

Abstract This study investigated the effects of systematically developed video variations on students’ scientific reasoning (SR) and epistemic beliefs (EBs). Drawing on a novel video development framework, we evaluated four video variations that differed in (i.) how scientific practices were presented—either in a cookbook style (focusing on declarative “what” information) or in a scientific reasoning style (integrating declarative, procedural, and epistemic knowledge) and (ii.) how scientists’ thought processes were presented—either as science-in-the-making (concurrent think-aloud insights) or as ready-made science (post hoc reconstruction of thought processes). In a pre–post design, 512 secondary students each engaged with a digital learning environment in which one of the video variations was embedded. Multivariate analyses of covariance (MANCOVAs) that were conducted to control for pretest performance revealed significant main effects of the presentation formats. The scientific reasoning style fostered more elaborated EBs regarding the source of scientific knowledge compared to the cookbook style. Presenting scientists’ thought processes as science-in-the-making improved EBs (again, regarding the source), whereas ready-made science led to higher SR performance in planning and conducting investigations. These findings demonstrate that fine-grained design choices in video representations of scientific practices support SR and EBs to different degrees. We discuss the implications for future research and for education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-026-10366-w
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Looking into the Scientist’s Mind: The Effects of Disclosing Scientists’ Rationale on Students’ Scientific Reasoning and Epistemic Beliefs

MIRIAM J. BRANDT, Katharina Düsing, Till Bruckermann, Vanessa van den Bogaert et al.
2 links
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Looking into the Scientist’s Mind: The Effects of Disclosing Scientists’ Rationale on Students’ Scientific Reasoning and Epistemic Beliefs

MIRIAM J. BRANDT, Katharina Düsing, Till Bruckermann, Vanessa van den Bogaert, Daniel Lewanzik, Ute Harms, Hannah Greving, Christian Claus Voigt, Anke Schumann, Julia Cathérine Thomas
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated the effects of systematically developed video variations on students’ scientific reasoning (SR) and epistemic beliefs (EBs). Drawing on a novel video development framework, we evaluated four video variations that differed in (i.) how scientific practices were presented—either in a cookbook style (focusing on declarative “what” information) or in a scientific reasoning style (integrating declarative, procedural, and epistemic knowledge) and (ii.) how scientists’ thought processes were presented—either as science-in-the-making (concurrent think-aloud insights) or as ready-made science (post hoc reconstruction of thought processes). In a pre–post design, 512 secondary students each engaged with a digital learning environment in which one of the video variations was embedded. Multivariate analyses of covariance (MANCOVAs) that were conducted to control for pretest performance revealed significant main effects of the presentation formats. The scientific reasoning style fostered more elaborated EBs regarding the source of scientific knowledge compared to the cookbook style. Presenting scientists’ thought processes as science-in-the-making improved EBs (again, regarding the source), whereas ready-made science led to higher SR performance in planning and conducting investigations. These findings demonstrate that fine-grained design choices in video representations of scientific practices support SR and EBs to different degrees. We discuss the implications for future research and for education.

Journal of Science Education and Technology
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE), Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien (DE), Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (DE)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon