Deepfake Generation and Detection Algorithms: A Comprehensive Survey of Multimodal Learning, Robustness, Explainability, and Trustworthy Synthetic Media Forensics

Deepfake generation now combines autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, diffusion models, transformers, neural rendering, and audio-conditioned synthesis. This survey presents a structured narrative synthesis of image, video, audio, and multimodal generation and detection, organised around the relationship between synthesis mechanisms and forensic evidence. Literature selection follows explicit source, search-term, eligibility, deduplication, and evidence-appraisal criteria. Generation methods are compared by conditioning requirements, identity preservation, temporal coherence, and computational cost. Detection methods are analysed through spatial, frequency, temporal, physiological, device, audio–visual, and provenance evidence, with attention to the assumptions that make each cue informative. Evaluation definitions distinguish reconstruction quality, distributional realism, identity and speech fidelity, classification performance, calibration, robustness, localisation, and efficiency. Results are interpreted within their dataset and protocol rather than pooled into an architecture-wide ranking. The comparative analysis separates demonstrated benchmark behaviour from proposed directions in open-set detection and multimodal synthesis. Practical recommendations prioritise held-out generators and datasets, realistic processing pipelines, explicit operating thresholds, calibrated confidence, faithful explanations, and provenance validation. Together, these requirements connect algorithmic performance to the evidence needed for trustworthy synthetic-media assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algorithms
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/a19110942
Primary Topic
Digital Media Forensic Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deepfake Generation and Detection Algorithms: A Comprehensive Survey of Multimodal Learning, Robustness, Explainability, and Trustworthy Synthetic Media Forensics

Edward Curry, Muhammad Umair, Kislay Raj, Mamoona Naveed Asghar et al.
1 links
Algorithms
Digital Media Forensic Detection
article

Deepfake Generation and Detection Algorithms: A Comprehensive Survey of Multimodal Learning, Robustness, Explainability, and Trustworthy Synthetic Media Forensics

Edward Curry, Muhammad Umair, Kislay Raj, Mamoona Naveed Asghar, Raja Vavekanand, Teerath Kumar, Sajjad Hussain Bhutto, Muhammad Javed, Shevta Kumari
article en

Abstract

Deepfake generation now combines autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, diffusion models, transformers, neural rendering, and audio-conditioned synthesis. This survey presents a structured narrative synthesis of image, video, audio, and multimodal generation and detection, organised around the relationship between synthesis mechanisms and forensic evidence. Literature selection follows explicit source, search-term, eligibility, deduplication, and evidence-appraisal criteria. Generation methods are compared by conditioning requirements, identity preservation, temporal coherence, and computational cost. Detection methods are analysed through spatial, frequency, temporal, physiological, device, audio–visual, and provenance evidence, with attention to the assumptions that make each cue informative. Evaluation definitions distinguish reconstruction quality, distributional realism, identity and speech fidelity, classification performance, calibration, robustness, localisation, and efficiency. Results are interpreted within their dataset and protocol rather than pooled into an architecture-wide ranking. The comparative analysis separates demonstrated benchmark behaviour from proposed directions in open-set detection and multimodal synthesis. Practical recommendations prioritise held-out generators and datasets, realistic processing pipelines, explicit operating thresholds, calibrated confidence, faithful explanations, and provenance validation. Together, these requirements connect algorithmic performance to the evidence needed for trustworthy synthetic-media assessment.

AlgorithmsVol. 19(11)
University College Dublin (IE), Donghua University (CN), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Dalian University of Technology (CN), Shanghai Dianji University (CN), Atlantic Technological University (IE), South East Technological University (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Digital Media Forensic Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon