Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring on Acute Care Utilization in Patients with Advanced Cancer Undergoing Phase I Therapies: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Purpose: Patients undergoing phase I cancer therapies experience high symptom burden and complications that may lead to emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. It is unclear whether remote symptom monitoring (RSM) reduces acute care utilization. We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial to determine if incorporating RSM into specialist palliative care (SPC) would reduce ED visits/hospitalizations. Methods: Patients with advanced cancer undergoing phase I therapies were randomized to SPC alone or SPC+RSM. Primary outcomes were ED visit and hospitalization frequencies over 6 months. We also assessed presenting concern, presentation etiology, and potential avoidability with two independent reviewers. Results: Among 100 patients (mean age 56, 63% female, median survival 221 [95% CI 171, 271] days), 43 were in the SPC group and 57 were in the SPC+RSM group. A total of 22/43 (51%) SPC patients and 30/57 (53%) SPC+RSM patients had at least one ED visit over 6 months (p = 0.58), while 18/43 (42%) SPC patients and 21/57 (37%) had at least one hospitalization over 6 months (p = 0.56). The most common presenting symptoms were pain (ED 27%, hospitalizations 29%) and respiratory symptoms (ED 22%, hospitalization 22%). The main reasons for acute care encounters were disease progression (ED 49%, hospitalizations 58%) and acute complications (ED 26%, hospitalizations 28%). Only 4/84 (5%) ED visits and 0/57 (0%) of the hospitalizations were deemed avoidable. Conclusions: Acute care utilization was high in phase I patients. RSM did not reduce ED visits/hospitalizations, which were mostly unavoidable. Our findings highlight the need for novel strategies to support this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18213499
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring on Acute Care Utilization in Patients with Advanced Cancer Undergoing Phase I Therapies: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Sanjay S. Shete, Ishwaria Mohan Subbiah, David Hui, Eduardo D Bruera et al.
8 links
Cancers
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring on Acute Care Utilization in Patients with Advanced Cancer Undergoing Phase I Therapies: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Sanjay S. Shete, Ishwaria Mohan Subbiah, David Hui, Eduardo D Bruera, David S. Hong, Jack Stover, Matthew Meranda, Minxing Chen
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Patients undergoing phase I cancer therapies experience high symptom burden and complications that may lead to emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. It is unclear whether remote symptom monitoring (RSM) reduces acute care utilization. We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial to determine if incorporating RSM into specialist palliative care (SPC) would reduce ED visits/hospitalizations. Methods: Patients with advanced cancer undergoing phase I therapies were randomized to SPC alone or SPC+RSM. Primary outcomes were ED visit and hospitalization frequencies over 6 months. We also assessed presenting concern, presentation etiology, and potential avoidability with two independent reviewers. Results: Among 100 patients (mean age 56, 63% female, median survival 221 [95% CI 171, 271] days), 43 were in the SPC group and 57 were in the SPC+RSM group. A total of 22/43 (51%) SPC patients and 30/57 (53%) SPC+RSM patients had at least one ED visit over 6 months (p = 0.58), while 18/43 (42%) SPC patients and 21/57 (37%) had at least one hospitalization over 6 months (p = 0.56). The most common presenting symptoms were pain (ED 27%, hospitalizations 29%) and respiratory symptoms (ED 22%, hospitalization 22%). The main reasons for acute care encounters were disease progression (ED 49%, hospitalizations 58%) and acute complications (ED 26%, hospitalizations 28%). Only 4/84 (5%) ED visits and 0/57 (0%) of the hospitalizations were deemed avoidable. Conclusions: Acute care utilization was high in phase I patients. RSM did not reduce ED visits/hospitalizations, which were mostly unavoidable. Our findings highlight the need for novel strategies to support this population.

CancersVol. 18(21)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Sarah Cannon (US)
American Cancer Society
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon