Moving beyond fragmented knowledge: Towards a research agenda for Health public–private partnership

Public–private partnerships are frequently advocated by policy makers as a means of financing the expansion of universal health coverage, particularly across the Global South. In this article we argue that despite this preference for public–private partnerships and the proliferation of accompanying research, much of our understanding of the impact of Health public–private partnerships is based on evidence from the Global North, and we only have fragmented scholarship on their effects. Little attention has been given to the (gendered) inequality impacts of Health public–private partnerships and the systemic nature of their impacts. By deploying a macro-meso-micro analytical framework, we identify some of the most significant knowledge gaps and call for a more systemic approach to craft a renewed research agenda. We argue that it is key to deepening our understanding of the systemic impacts of Health public–private partnerships and building a more comprehensive body of evidence to better inform policy choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Social Policy
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181261500600
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving beyond fragmented knowledge: Towards a research agenda for Health public–private partnership

María José Romero, Jasmine Gideon
Global Social Policy
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
article

Moving beyond fragmented knowledge: Towards a research agenda for Health public–private partnership

María José Romero, Jasmine Gideon
article en

Abstract

Public–private partnerships are frequently advocated by policy makers as a means of financing the expansion of universal health coverage, particularly across the Global South. In this article we argue that despite this preference for public–private partnerships and the proliferation of accompanying research, much of our understanding of the impact of Health public–private partnerships is based on evidence from the Global North, and we only have fragmented scholarship on their effects. Little attention has been given to the (gendered) inequality impacts of Health public–private partnerships and the systemic nature of their impacts. By deploying a macro-meso-micro analytical framework, we identify some of the most significant knowledge gaps and call for a more systemic approach to craft a renewed research agenda. We argue that it is key to deepening our understanding of the systemic impacts of Health public–private partnerships and building a more comprehensive body of evidence to better inform policy choices.

Global Social Policy
European Network on Debt and Development (BE), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon