Public Munificence and Power Negotiations in the Bosporan Kingdom

This article investigates public munificence (euergetism) in the Bosporan Kingdom from the 1st century BCE to the 3rd century CE, examining how gift exchange and honorific practices operated within a long-lasting framework of Roman dependency. Analysing a corpus of 118 inscriptions—comprising tituli honorarii, public dedications, and building inscriptions—the study demonstrates that munificence served as a vital mechanism for ongoing power negotiation rather than mere court propaganda. Rulers utilised benefactions, imperial titulature, and architectural patronage to secure their “two-level sovereignty” under Roman hegemony. At the same time, municipal elites and court dignitaries employed building initiatives and honours to legitimise their social status and compete for local influence. Furthermore, the epigraphic evidence reveals clear regional divergences. While the European Bosporus remained heavily centralised around the royal court at Panticapaeum, the Asiatic cities displayed greater civic agency and institutional self-organisation. Ultimately, Bosporan euergetism represents a dynamic process of cultural glocalisation that successfully bridged Roman imperial authority, Greek civic traditions, and nomadic steppe elements to maintain internal cohesion along the Black Sea frontier.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arts
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/arts15110250
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Munificence and Power Negotiations in the Bosporan Kingdom

Michał Halamus
Arts
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Public Munificence and Power Negotiations in the Bosporan Kingdom

Michał Halamus
article en

Abstract

This article investigates public munificence (euergetism) in the Bosporan Kingdom from the 1st century BCE to the 3rd century CE, examining how gift exchange and honorific practices operated within a long-lasting framework of Roman dependency. Analysing a corpus of 118 inscriptions—comprising tituli honorarii, public dedications, and building inscriptions—the study demonstrates that munificence served as a vital mechanism for ongoing power negotiation rather than mere court propaganda. Rulers utilised benefactions, imperial titulature, and architectural patronage to secure their “two-level sovereignty” under Roman hegemony. At the same time, municipal elites and court dignitaries employed building initiatives and honours to legitimise their social status and compete for local influence. Furthermore, the epigraphic evidence reveals clear regional divergences. While the European Bosporus remained heavily centralised around the royal court at Panticapaeum, the Asiatic cities displayed greater civic agency and institutional self-organisation. Ultimately, Bosporan euergetism represents a dynamic process of cultural glocalisation that successfully bridged Roman imperial authority, Greek civic traditions, and nomadic steppe elements to maintain internal cohesion along the Black Sea frontier.

ArtsVol. 15(11)
University of Wrocław (PL)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Public Munificence and Power Negotiations in the Bosporan Kingdom — Michał Halamus · Arts (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS