Preoperative Subchondral Insufficiency Fractures Are Associated With Decreased Clinically Significant Outcome Achievement, Higher Reoperation Rates, and Greater Osteoarthritis Progression After Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair at a Minimum 2‐Yea

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of preoperative subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee (SIFK) on the outcomes of medial meniscus posterior root tear repair. METHODS: Patients undergoing repair of an isolated primary medial meniscus posterior root tear with ≥2-year follow-up were included. Data encompassed demographics, history, magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed SIFK, subsequent surgery, radiographic osteoarthritis progression, and patient-reported outcome measures: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement; International Knee Documentation Committee; and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey. Patients were stratified by SIFK status. Clinically significant improvement was assessed using cohort-specific minimal clinically important difference thresholds. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients (mean age: 56.5 ± 9.4 years, 73.6% women; mean body mass index: 32.5 ± 6.1) were included with a follow-up of 38.3 ± 15.3 months (range, 24-82), which did not differ between groups (P = .841). Thirty-four patients (37.4%) had SIFK, and 85% had SIFK grade 1 or 2. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. Compared with patients without SIFK, those with SIFK showed lower rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference and patient-acceptable symptom state for Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (80.7% vs 38.2%, P < .001; 61.4% vs 35.3%, P = .028, respectively). Patients with SIFK demonstrated higher rates of subsequent surgery (20.6% [95% confidence interval, 8.7%-37.9%] vs 5.3% [95% confidence interval, 1.1%-14.6%]; risk difference, 15.3% [95% confidence interval, 1.6%-31.9%]; P = .036) and a higher postoperative Kellgren-Lawrence grade (median [interquartile range], 3.0 [3.0-4.0] vs 2.0 [2.0-3.0]; P = .013), with smaller postoperative joint space (2.8 ± 0.6 mm vs 3.8 ± 1.0 mm, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative SIFK is associated with lower rates of achieving meaningful clinical improvement along with a higher likelihood of subsequent surgeries and inferior postoperative radiographic osteoarthritis outcomes after medial meniscus posterior root tear repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arj.70712
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative Subchondral Insufficiency Fractures Are Associated With Decreased Clinically Significant Outcome Achievement, Higher Reoperation Rates, and Greater Osteoarthritis Progression After Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair at a Minimum 2‐Yea

Myles A. Atkins, Udit Dave, Eric M. Cohen, Jorge A. Chahla et al.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Preoperative Subchondral Insufficiency Fractures Are Associated With Decreased Clinically Significant Outcome Achievement, Higher Reoperation Rates, and Greater Osteoarthritis Progression After Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair at a Minimum 2‐Yea

Myles A. Atkins, Udit Dave, Eric M. Cohen, Jorge A. Chahla, Adam Blair Yanke, Ron Gilat, Kyleen Jan, Nikhil N. Verma, Brian J. Cole, Michael L. Ralls, José Rafael García, Michael Murray
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of preoperative subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee (SIFK) on the outcomes of medial meniscus posterior root tear repair. METHODS: Patients undergoing repair of an isolated primary medial meniscus posterior root tear with ≥2-year follow-up were included. Data encompassed demographics, history, magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed SIFK, subsequent surgery, radiographic osteoarthritis progression, and patient-reported outcome measures: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement; International Knee Documentation Committee; and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey. Patients were stratified by SIFK status. Clinically significant improvement was assessed using cohort-specific minimal clinically important difference thresholds. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients (mean age: 56.5 ± 9.4 years, 73.6% women; mean body mass index: 32.5 ± 6.1) were included with a follow-up of 38.3 ± 15.3 months (range, 24-82), which did not differ between groups (P = .841). Thirty-four patients (37.4%) had SIFK, and 85% had SIFK grade 1 or 2. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. Compared with patients without SIFK, those with SIFK showed lower rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference and patient-acceptable symptom state for Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (80.7% vs 38.2%, P < .001; 61.4% vs 35.3%, P = .028, respectively). Patients with SIFK demonstrated higher rates of subsequent surgery (20.6% [95% confidence interval, 8.7%-37.9%] vs 5.3% [95% confidence interval, 1.1%-14.6%]; risk difference, 15.3% [95% confidence interval, 1.6%-31.9%]; P = .036) and a higher postoperative Kellgren-Lawrence grade (median [interquartile range], 3.0 [3.0-4.0] vs 2.0 [2.0-3.0]; P = .013), with smaller postoperative joint space (2.8 ± 0.6 mm vs 3.8 ± 1.0 mm, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative SIFK is associated with lower rates of achieving meaningful clinical improvement along with a higher likelihood of subsequent surgeries and inferior postoperative radiographic osteoarthritis outcomes after medial meniscus posterior root tear repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Rush University Medical Center (US), University of South Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon