Experimental and finite element analysis of tubular auxetic structures with varying cross-sectional geometries

Abstract Tubular auxetic metamaterials are attractive for lightweight protection and energy absorption because their deformation can be regulated through structural design. However, the effects of different cross-sectional configurations on the compressive behavior of tubular auxetic lattices remain insufficiently compared within a unified framework. In this study, two tubular auxetic lattice metamaterials with square and circular cross sections, denoted as XATL and XATLC, were designed using the same unit-cell arrangement. Baseline XATL specimens were fabricated by powder bed fusion and tested under quasi-static axial compression to validate the finite element framework, which was subsequently used for numerical comparisons of XATL and XATLC and for the parametric analyses. The numerical model reproduced the main experimental deformation process, including inward contraction, progressive folding, local contact, and post-peak collapse. XATL exhibited a higher peak load, reaching 370 N, whereas XATLC showed slightly higher total energy absorption and higher specific energy absorption, reaching 2.6 J and 319 J/kg, respectively. Parametric analysis indicated that increasing height alters the deformation path and affects mass-specific energy absorption differently for the two cross-sectional configurations, whereas increasing wall thickness improves stiffness, peak load, and energy absorption while shortening the stable auxetic stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Research Express
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/aebc17
Primary Topic
Cellular and Composite Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental and finite element analysis of tubular auxetic structures with varying cross-sectional geometries

Suhang Ding, Xinfu Chi, Zongtao Wan, Shengyuan Wang et al.
6 links
Engineering Research Express
Cellular and Composite Structures
article

Experimental and finite element analysis of tubular auxetic structures with varying cross-sectional geometries

Suhang Ding, Xinfu Chi, Zongtao Wan, Shengyuan Wang, Caiting Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Tubular auxetic metamaterials are attractive for lightweight protection and energy absorption because their deformation can be regulated through structural design. However, the effects of different cross-sectional configurations on the compressive behavior of tubular auxetic lattices remain insufficiently compared within a unified framework. In this study, two tubular auxetic lattice metamaterials with square and circular cross sections, denoted as XATL and XATLC, were designed using the same unit-cell arrangement. Baseline XATL specimens were fabricated by powder bed fusion and tested under quasi-static axial compression to validate the finite element framework, which was subsequently used for numerical comparisons of XATL and XATLC and for the parametric analyses. The numerical model reproduced the main experimental deformation process, including inward contraction, progressive folding, local contact, and post-peak collapse. XATL exhibited a higher peak load, reaching 370 N, whereas XATLC showed slightly higher total energy absorption and higher specific energy absorption, reaching 2.6 J and 319 J/kg, respectively. Parametric analysis indicated that increasing height alters the deformation path and affects mass-specific energy absorption differently for the two cross-sectional configurations, whereas increasing wall thickness improves stiffness, peak load, and energy absorption while shortening the stable auxetic stage.

Engineering Research Express
Donghua University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Cellular and Composite Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon